Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Sub-Divisional Officer in PMLA Case for Allegedly Granting NA Permission in CRZ Area. The court held that the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA were satisfied as there was no prima facie evidence of money laundering beyond the scheduled offence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Jayram Vinayak Deshpande, was a Sub-Divisional Officer at Dapoli who granted NA permission for land in Gat No. 446 at Murud, which fell within CRZ-III area. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change filed a private complaint for violation of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, which became a scheduled offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The Enforcement Directorate registered ECIR No. ECIR/MBZO-I/57/2022 and arrested the applicant on 13/03/2023. The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 45 PMLA. The court considered the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA and found that the applicant had no direct role in money laundering and was not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The court granted bail on certain conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail - PMLA - Section 45 PMLA - Twin Conditions - The court considered the application for bail under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 45 PMLA. The applicant, a Sub-Divisional Officer, was accused of granting NA permission for land in CRZ-III area, allegedly aiding money laundering. The court examined whether the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA were satisfied. Held that the applicant had made out a case for bail as there was no prima facie evidence of his involvement in money laundering beyond the scheduled offence. (Paras 1-14)

B) Environmental Law - Scheduled Offence - PMLA - Section 3 and 4 PMLA - The scheduled offence under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Section 15 read with Section 7) formed the basis of the PMLA case. The court noted that the applicant's role was limited to granting NA permission, and the proceeds of crime were not directly attributable to him. Held that the applicant was not likely to commit any offence while on bail. (Paras 3-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 45 PMLA for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of PMLA.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Bail granted to the applicant on certain conditions.

Law Points

  • Bail under PMLA
  • Section 45 PMLA twin conditions
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Scheduled Offence under PMLA
  • Environment (Protection) Act
  • 1986
  • CRZ-III
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 152

BAIL APPLICATION NO.3553 OF 2023

2024-02-29

M. S. Karnik

2024:BHC-AS:9792

A.P. Mundargi, Subir Sarkar, Hrishikesh Mundargi, Paavani Chadha, Ashish Chavan, B.B. Kulkarni

Jayram Vinayak Deshpande

Directorate of Enforcement, State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Bail application under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 45 PMLA in connection with ECIR for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of PMLA.

Remedy Sought

Applicant seeks bail from custody.

Filing Reason

Applicant was arrested on 13/03/2023 for allegedly granting NA permission in CRZ-III area, constituting a scheduled offence under PMLA.

Issues

Whether the applicant satisfies the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA for grant of bail. Whether the applicant's role in granting NA permission amounts to money laundering under PMLA.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that he acted in good faith and the land was not in CRZ area as per available records. Respondent argued that the applicant knowingly granted permission in CRZ-III area, aiding money laundering.

Ratio Decidendi

The twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA are satisfied as there is no prima facie evidence that the applicant is guilty of money laundering beyond the scheduled offence, and he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The applicant is the accused no.2 in the aforesaid ECIR registered by ED. The applicant was arrested on 13/03/2023.

Procedural History

Private complaint filed on 10/03/2022 by Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; ECIR registered; applicant arrested on 13/03/2023; bail application filed on 29/02/2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA): 3, 4, 45
  • Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: 7, 15, 19
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Tenant's claim of possession based on purchase of shed and payment of rent rejected as findings of fact by courts below...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Examines Legality of Pension Recovery Conditions Imposed Post-Facto for APMC Employment. Petition Challenges Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal’s Finding that Reemployment Constituted Commercial Em...