Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period. Reopening Based on Non-Escapement of Income as Assessee Had Already Disclosed Full Details During Original Assessment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Bajaj Energy Limited, a company engaged in energy business, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2014-15 on 30th November 2014 declaring total income of Rs. 1,01,63,86,870/-. The return was processed under Section 143(1) and later selected for scrutiny under Section 143(2). During the scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer examined various issues including the claim of deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of a windmill. The assessee provided all details and explanations. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) on 29th December 2016 accepting the returned income. Subsequently, on 21st January 2022, the Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 148 of the Act seeking to reopen the assessment on the ground that the assessee had claimed deduction under Section 80-IA in respect of a windmill which was not eligible as per the provisions. The petitioner challenged the notice on the ground that it was issued beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year and that there was no failure to disclose material facts. The court held that the notice was barred by limitation as the proviso to Section 147 applied, requiring that for reopening after four years, there must be a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Since the assessee had disclosed all details during the original assessment, the reopening was not valid. The court also noted that the reopening was based on a change of opinion as the same issue was examined during the original assessment. The writ petition was allowed and the notice under Section 148 was quashed.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reopening of Assessment - Section 148, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Limitation - Notice issued beyond four years from end of relevant assessment year - Assessee had disclosed all material facts - No failure to disclose - Reopening based on non-escapement of income - Held that notice was barred by limitation and liable to be quashed (Paras 1-10).

B) Income Tax - Reopening of Assessment - Section 147, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Change of Opinion - Reassessment sought on same material already considered - No new tangible material - Held that reopening on change of opinion is impermissible (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening of assessment was valid when the assessee had disclosed all material facts during the original assessment and the notice was issued beyond the limitation period.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The notice dated 21st January 2022 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute in those terms.

Law Points

  • Reopening of assessment
  • limitation period
  • Section 148 notice
  • Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • non-escapement of income
  • full disclosure
  • change of opinion
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (01) 225

Writ Petition No. 1225 of 2022

2024-01-23

K. R. Shriram, Dr. Neela Gokhale

Mr. Jeet Kamdar, i/by Mr. Sameer G. Dalal, for Petitioner; Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma, for Respondents-Revenue

Bajaj Energy Limited

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3(1)(1), Mumbai; Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income-tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi; Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening of assessment.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 21st January 2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Filing Reason

Notice issued beyond limitation period and without any failure to disclose material facts.

Previous Decisions

Original assessment completed under Section 143(3) on 29th December 2016 accepting returned income.

Issues

Whether the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was barred by limitation? Whether there was any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts? Whether the reopening was based on a change of opinion?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the notice was issued beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year and there was no failure to disclose material facts, hence the proviso to Section 147 applied and the notice was invalid. Respondents argued that the assessee had not disclosed the fact that the windmill was not eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA, and therefore reopening was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

For reopening of assessment beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the proviso to Section 147 requires that there must be a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Since the assessee had disclosed all details during the original assessment, the reopening was not valid. Additionally, reopening based on a change of opinion on the same material is impermissible.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner assails order dated 21st January 2022 rejecting the... Rule. Heard the parties finally by consent. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed its return for AY 2014-15 on 30th November 2014. The return was processed under Section 143(1) and selected for scrutiny. Assessment was completed under Section 143(3) on 29th December 2016. On 21st January 2022, a notice under Section 148 was issued seeking to reopen the assessment. The petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging the notice.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 80-IA, Section 143(1), Section 143(2), Section 143(3), Section 147, Section 148
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Father in Daughter's Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for strangulation set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and last seen theory beyond rea...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period. Reopening Based on Non-Escapement of Income as Assessee Had Already Disclosed Full Detail...