High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Suit for Injunction Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Not Party to Proceedings. Award Set Aside as Petitioner's Rights Affected Without Hearing Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Chandpasha s/o Amirsab Ansari, filed a writ petition challenging an award dated 17.03.2019 passed by the National Lok Adalat, Ausa in RCS No.174/2019. The petitioner is the step-brother of respondent no.1 and step-son of respondent no.2. Respondent no.2 is the wife of respondent no.3. Respondent no.1 had filed RCS No.174/2019 for perpetual injunction against respondent nos.2 and 3. The petitioner was not a party to that litigation. The suit land was owned by respondent no.3, who had gifted it to the petitioner. The Lok Adalat passed an award without notice to the petitioner, affecting his rights. The petitioner contended that the award was passed in violation of principles of natural justice. The court found that the petitioner's rights were directly affected and he was not heard. The court held that the award was liable to be set aside. The court quashed the award and restored the suit to its original number. The court also disposed of the civil application.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Lok Adalat Award - Principles of Natural Justice - Section 21, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - The petitioner, who was not a party to the suit, challenged the Lok Adalat award that affected his rights. The court held that the award was passed in violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not heard. The award was quashed and set aside, and the suit was restored to its original number. (Paras 2-5)

B) Legal Services - Lok Adalat - Binding Nature of Award - Section 21, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - The court observed that a Lok Adalat award is final and binding on the parties, but if it is passed without hearing a person whose rights are affected, it is liable to be set aside. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Lok Adalat award can be set aside when it affects the rights of a person who was not a party to the proceedings and was not heard.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed and set aside the award dated 17.03.2019 passed by the National Lok Adalat, Ausa in RCS No.174/2019, and restored the suit to its original number. Rule made absolute. Civil application disposed of.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Lok Adalat award binding nature
  • Section 21 Legal Services Authorities Act
  • 1987
  • violation of natural justice
  • setting aside award without hearing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (01) 83

Writ Petition No. 7595 / 2020 with Civil Application No. 11482 / 2023

2024-01-29

Shailesh P. Brahme, J.

2024:BHC-AUG:1859

Mrs. Anjali Dube (Bajpai) for Petitioner, Mr. R.P. Adgaonkar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2

Chandpasha s/o Amirsab Ansari

Ejaz s/o Amirsab Ansari, Amatulabi w/o Amirsab Ansari, Amirsab s/o Chandsaab Ansari (deceased) through L.Rs.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging Lok Adalat award in a suit for perpetual injunction.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of Lok Adalat award dated 17.03.2019 passed in RCS No.174/2019.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was not a party to the suit but the award affected his rights over the suit land which was gifted to him by respondent no.3.

Previous Decisions

Lok Adalat passed an award on 17.03.2019 in RCS No.174/2019.

Issues

Whether the Lok Adalat award is liable to be set aside for violation of principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not heard. Whether the award affects the rights of the petitioner who was not a party to the suit.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the award was passed without notice to him and in violation of natural justice. Respondents opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

A Lok Adalat award is final and binding on the parties, but if it is passed without hearing a person whose rights are affected, it is liable to be set aside for violation of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is challenging an award dated 17.03.2019 passed by the National Lok Adalat, Ausa in RCS No.174/2019. The petitioner was not party to the litigation. The award is liable to be set aside as it was passed in violation of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

Respondent no.1 filed RCS No.174/2019 for perpetual injunction against respondent nos.2 and 3. The matter was referred to Lok Adalat which passed an award on 17.03.2019. The petitioner, who was not a party, filed this writ petition challenging the award. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 22.01.2024, pronouncing on 29.01.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987: Section 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitral Tribunal Order Imposing Condition on Petitioner to Deposit Amount for Filing Counterclaim. The court held that the Arbitral Tribunal has no power under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to impose such...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Land Allotment to Project Affected Person. Allotment of land in lieu of acquisition cannot be cancelled without affording opportunity of hearing and without valid reasons.