Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Following Settlement. Court holds that non-compoundable offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when parties have amicably settled and wife has no objection.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, Muniroddin S/o. Mainoddin Shaikh, Shaikh Mainoddin S/o. Shaikh Jamaloddin, and Sharifabi W/o. Mainoddin Shaikh, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. They sought quashing of R.C.C. No. 984 of 2018 pending before the Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Court No. 11, Aurangabad, arising out of C.R. No. 238 of 2017 registered with Jinsi Police Station, Aurangabad, for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The first applicant is the husband of respondent No. 2, Nusrat Jahan @ Guddi, and the other two applicants are his parents. The dispute originated from a matrimonial discord between the husband and wife. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties arrived at an amicable settlement. The wife, respondent No. 2, filed an affidavit stating that she had no objection to the quashing of the proceedings. The Court, after hearing the parties and considering the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra (2025), which held that in matrimonial disputes, even non-compoundable offences can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC if the settlement is genuine and voluntary, allowed the application. The Court quashed the proceedings of R.C.C. No. 984 of 2018 and the FIR No. 238 of 2017, thereby granting the relief sought by the applicants.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Matrimonial Settlement - The applicants sought quashing of R.C.C. No. 984 of 2018 arising from FIR No. 238 of 2017 for offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC. The Court, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra (2025), allowed the application and quashed the proceedings, noting that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and the wife had no objection. (Paras 1-5)

B) Indian Penal Code - Offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 - Compounding - The Court held that in matrimonial disputes, even non-compoundable offences can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC if the settlement is genuine and voluntary, and the chances of conviction are bleak. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 can be quashed on the basis of a settlement between the husband and wife.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The proceedings of R.C.C. No. 984 of 2018 pending before the Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Court No. 11, Aurangabad, and the FIR No. 238 of 2017 registered with Jinsi Police Station, Aurangabad, are quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
  • Compounding of non-compoundable offences
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • Section 323 IPC
  • Section 504 IPC
  • Section 506 IPC
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Settlement between parties
  • Matrimonial disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 31

Criminal Application No. 673 of 2024

2025-09-10

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Hiten S. Venegavkar

2025:BHC-AUG:26167-DB

Mr. Anant R. Devakate (for Applicants), Mr. Abhijeet M. Phule (APP for Respondent No.1 – State), Ms. Gayatri S. Kalve h/f Mr. Mahesh V. Ghatge (for Respondent No.2)

Muniroddin S/o. Mainoddin Shaikh, Shaikh Mainoddin S/o. Shaikh Jamaloddin, Sharifabi W/o. Mainoddin Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra, Nusrat Jahan @ Guddi W/o. Munirrodin Shaikn

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of R.C.C. No. 984 of 2018 pending before Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Court No. 11, Aurangabad, and FIR No. 238 of 2017 registered with Jinsi Police Station, Aurangabad.

Filing Reason

The applicants, being husband and in-laws of respondent No. 2, sought quashing of criminal proceedings initiated by the wife alleging offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute.

Issues

Whether criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC can be quashed on the basis of a settlement between husband and wife.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicants argued that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the wife has no objection to the quashing of proceedings. The State and respondent No. 2 did not oppose the application.

Ratio Decidendi

In matrimonial disputes, even non-compoundable offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC if the parties have genuinely settled the dispute and the chances of conviction are bleak, as held by the Supreme Court in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra.

Judgment Excerpts

We informed the learned Advocate for the applicants that in terms of the present ruling of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni vs. State of Maharashtra and another, [Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri.) No.13424 of 2025] decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 3rd September 2025, the application will have to be amended so as to challenge the order of taking cognizance by the trial Court along with incorporating necessary pleadings in support of the said amendment.

Procedural History

The applicants filed Criminal Application No. 673 of 2024 under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking quashing of R.C.C. No. 984 of 2018 and FIR No. 238 of 2017. The Court heard the parties and, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni (2025), allowed the application on 10 September 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Following Settlement. Court holds that non-compoundable offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when parties have amicably...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Clubbing of Three Cheque Dishonour Complaints Under Section 138 NI Act for Joint Trial. Common Transaction and Same Parties Justify Consolidation to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.