Supreme Court Upholds Defendant in Bombay Bullion Association Bye-law Dispute - Cheque Payments Without Certification Upheld as Valid. Clearing House Account Transfers and Ascertainment of Funds at Branch Satisfy Bye-law 137-B Requirement of Certified Cheque Under Bombay Forward Contracts Control Act, 1947.

In Favour of Accused
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the Bombay Bullion Association's forward contracts in bullion. The appellant, a member carrying on business as a bullion merchant, defaulted as a forward seller on the settlement day of February 3, 1953. Acting under its bye-laws, the Association purchased a quantity of silver at the appellant's risk and claimed the difference amounting to Rs 1,37,880-12-0. The appellant paid this sum under protest and filed a suit for refund, challenging the validity of the purchase on the ground that the forward purchasers had not fulfilled their obligations under the bye-laws. Specifically, the appellant argued that certain purchasers paid into the Clearing House by cheques drawn on their accounts with the Clearing House without getting them certified as good for payment as required by bye-law 137-B, and that one payment was made by a cheque drawn on a branch of the Clearing House in the city, also not certified. The Bombay High Court dismissed the suit, and a Division Bench affirmed the dismissal. The Supreme Court, by special leave, considered whether the requirements of bye-law 137-B were satisfied on the facts. On the first contention, the Court held that where a cheque drawn on an account with the Clearing House results in the amount being transferred to the Association's Clearing House account, it is virtually a payment in cash, even though in form a cheque. Since cash payment is a recognized mode under the bye-law, the payment was valid. On the second contention, the Court held that where the Clearing House accepted the cheque drawn on a branch and credited it to the Association after ascertaining from that branch that the drawer had sufficient funds, the cheque need not be certified as good for payment. The banker's certificate contemplated by the bye-law is that of a bank different from the one into which the cheque is being paid; here the staff of the Clearing House verified the funds, satisfying the requirement. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the High Court's decision, upholding the Association's purchase and the payment made by the appellant as valid.

Headnote

A) Banking - Cheque Payment - Bye-law 137-B, Bombay Bullion Association - Payment by cheque drawn on account with Clearing House where amount transferred to Association's Clearing House account is equivalent to cash - Bombay Bullion Association Ltd. Bye-law 137-B - The appellant contended that purchasers' payments by cheques drawn on their Clearing House accounts were invalid because cheques were not certified as good for payment; however, where the amount was transferred to the Association's Clearing House account, it was virtually a payment in cash and satisfied the bye-law's requirement of a valid payment. Held that such payment is valid.

B) Banking - Cheque Certification - Bye-law 137-B, Bombay Bullion Association - Cheque drawn on branch of Clearing House need not be certified if Clearing House ascertains sufficient funds from that branch - Bombay Bullion Association Ltd. Bye-law 137-B - A payment made by cheque drawn on a branch of the Clearing House in the city, not certified, was valid when the Clearing House accepted the cheque and credited it to the Association after ascertaining from the branch that the drawer had enough funds; the certificate of the banker referred to in the bye-law is the certificate of a bank different from that into which the cheque is being paid. Held that such cheque satisfied the requirement of a cheque certified as good for payment within the bye-law.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the payments made by purchasers by cheques drawn on accounts with the Clearing House, without certification as good for payment as required by bye-law 137-B, were valid; whether a cheque drawn on a branch of the Clearing House in the city, not certified, was valid when the Clearing House accepted it after ascertaining sufficient funds.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; High Court's judgment affirmed; payments valid; Association's purchase upheld.

Law Points

  • Payment by cheque drawn on account with Clearing House where amount transferred to Association's account is virtually cash
  • certification of cheque is unnecessary when Clearing House ascertains sufficient funds from branch
  • bye-law 137-B satisfied by such transfer
  • validity of purchase by Association on defaulting seller
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1964 LawText (SC) (11) 26

Civil Appeal No. 56 of 1962

1964-11-25

N. Rajagopala Ayyangar, A.K. Sarkar, J.R. Mudholkar

1965 AIR 1628, 1965 SCR (2) 249

Purshattam Tricumdas, J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur, Ravinder Narain; H.N. Sanyal, Solicitor-General, N. P. Nathwani, AtiqurRehman, K. L. Hathi

Sita Ram Jhunjhunawala

Bombay Bullion Association Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal challenging validity of purchase by Association treating appellant as defaulter under bye-laws; dispute over payment by cheques without certification.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought refund of Rs 1,37,880-12-0 paid under protest, claiming purchase was invalid and not binding.

Filing Reason

Appellant defaulted as forward seller on settlement day; Association purchased silver at his risk and claimed difference; appellant paid under protest and filed suit for refund challenging legality.

Previous Decisions

Bombay High Court (Coyajee J.) dismissed the suit; Division Bench affirmed dismissal; appeal by special leave to Supreme Court.

Issues

Whether payment by cheque drawn on account with the Clearing House, without certification as good for payment under bye-law 137-B, was valid when the amount was transferred to the Association's Clearing House account. Whether a cheque drawn on a branch of the Clearing House in the city, not certified as good for payment, was valid when the Clearing House accepted it after ascertaining from the branch that the drawer had sufficient funds.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that purchasers' cheques drawn on Clearing House accounts were not certified as good for payment as required by bye-law 137-B, rendering payments invalid. Appellant argued that one payment was made by cheque drawn on a branch of the Clearing House, not certified, also violating the bye-law. Respondents/Association argued that payments were valid as cash transfers or equivalent and that certification was not required when the Clearing House itself ascertained sufficient funds from the branch.

Ratio Decidendi

When a cheque drawn on an account with the Clearing House results in transfer of amount to the Association's Clearing House account, it is virtually a cash payment and satisfies bye-law 137-B; a cheque drawn on a branch of the Clearing House need not be certified if the Clearing House ascertains from that branch that sufficient funds are available, because the banker's certificate contemplated by the bye-law applies to a cheque paid into a different bank.

Judgment Excerpts

Where a payment was made by a cheque drawn on an account with the Clearing House and the amount represented by that cheque was transferred to the Clearing House Account of the Association, it is virtually a payment in cash, though in form a payment by cheque. Where the Clearing House had accepted the cheque and credited it to the Association after ascertaining from the branch on which it was drawn, that the drawer of the cheque had enough funds at that branch for meeting of the cheque, the cheque need not be certified as good for payment.

Procedural History

Appeal by special leave from judgment and decree dated March 3, 4, 1958 of Bombay High Court in Appeal No. 27 of 1957; original suit dismissed by Coyajee J.; Division Bench affirmed dismissal; appeal to Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Forward Contracts Control Act, 1947: Section 6
  • Bombay Bullion Association Bye-laws: Bye-law 32, Bye-law 120, Bye-law 137-B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Dismissal on Technical Ground in Property Transfer Case. High Court Erred in Dismissing Petition Solely Because Appellants Did Not Obtain Leave to File Fresh Case When Withdrawing Earlier Writ Petition...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Defendant in Bombay Bullion Association Bye-law Dispute - Cheque Payments Without Certification Upheld as Valid. Clearing House Account Transfers and Ascertainment of Funds at Branch Satisfy Bye-law 137-B Requirement of Certifie...