Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Dismissal of Writ Against Co-operative Housing Society. Delay of 110 Days Not Condoned as Orders Passed in Independent Proceedings Do Not Constitute Sufficient Cause.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 521
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mahesh K. Mehta, filed a review petition seeking recall or modification of a judgment dated 20th February 2024 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.1518 of 2024. The original writ petition had been dismissed on two grounds: first, that the issues raised were already pending before various forums including the Co-operative Court, Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, and other writ petitions; and second, that no writ petition lies against a co-operative housing society as it is a private entity. The petitioner challenged this order before the Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).8543-8544 of 2024, which was dismissed on 3rd May 2024 with observations that the petitioner could raise his grievances before the authorities where proceedings were pending. Subsequently, the Co-operative Appellate Court rejected the petitioner's review application on 2nd March 2024, a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court passed an interim order in Civil Writ Petition No.5939 of 2024 on 14th June 2024 permitting the petitioner to carry out his activity, and a Co-ordinate Bench clarified an order in Criminal Writ Petition No.1399 of 2016 on 18th June 2024. The petitioner then filed the present review petition with an interim application for condonation of delay of 110 days. The Court considered whether the delay should be condoned and whether the review petition was maintainable. The Court held that the reasons given for the delay—pursuing matters before various forums after the Supreme Court's order—did not constitute sufficient cause because those orders were passed in independent proceedings already pending on the date of the original order. The Court further held that even if the delay were condoned, the review petition lacked merit as the petitioner failed to show any error apparent on the record. The original order had been confirmed by the Supreme Court and had attained finality. The finding that no writ lies against a co-operative housing society was not challenged and became final. The petitioner's reliance on Khoday Distilleries Limited v. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Limited was found inapplicable. The Court dismissed the review petition and the interim application.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Review Petition - Condonation of Delay - Sufficient Cause - The petitioner sought review of an order dismissing his writ petition on the ground that issues were pending before other forums and no writ lies against a co-operative housing society. The delay of 110 days was explained by the petitioner as being due to pursuing matters before various forums after the Supreme Court dismissed his SLP. The Court held that orders passed in independent proceedings after the Supreme Court's order do not constitute sufficient cause for condoning the delay, as the review petition sought review of the original order which had attained finality. (Paras 9-10)

B) Civil Procedure - Review Petition - Maintainability - Error Apparent on Record - The petitioner failed to show any mistake apparent from the record in the order dated 20th February 2024. The order had been confirmed by the Supreme Court and had attained finality. The Court held that in review, it cannot quash an order which has attained finality, and the finding that no writ lies against a co-operative housing society had become final. (Para 10)

C) Co-operative Societies - Writ Jurisdiction - Maintainability - The Court in its original order held that no writ petition lies against a co-operative housing society as it is a private entity. This finding was not challenged in the review petition and became final. (Para 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay of 110 days in filing the review petition should be condoned and whether the review petition is maintainable on merits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The review petition and the interim application for condonation of delay are dismissed.

Law Points

  • Review petition
  • condonation of delay
  • sufficient cause
  • finality of order
  • writ against co-operative society
  • error apparent on record
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (8) 93

REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.21934 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1518 OF 2024

2024-08-09

A. S. Chandurkar, Jitendra Jain

Mr. Mahesh K. Mehta (Petitioner-in-person), Mr. Kushal Amin a/w Mr. Kunjan Makwana i/by S. K. Srivastav & Co. for Respondent No.1, Mr. A. L. Patki, Addl. G. P. for Respondent Nos.2 and 3-State

Mr. Mahesh K. Mehta

The Bharatiya Friend's Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd., The State of Maharashtra, Additional Commissioner of Police

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review petition seeking recall/modification of a judgment dismissing a writ petition against a co-operative housing society.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought recall or modification of the judgment dated 20th February 2024 dismissing his writ petition, and condonation of delay of 110 days in filing the review petition.

Filing Reason

The petitioner claimed that the delay was due to pursuing matters before various forums after the Supreme Court dismissed his SLP, and that there was an error apparent on record in the original order.

Previous Decisions

The writ petition was dismissed on 20th February 2024 on the ground that issues were pending before other forums and no writ lies against a co-operative housing society. The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP on 3rd May 2024. The Co-operative Appellate Court rejected review on 2nd March 2024. A Single Judge passed an interim order in Civil Writ Petition No.5939 of 2024 on 14th June 2024. A Co-ordinate Bench clarified an order in Criminal Writ Petition No.1399 of 2016 on 18th June 2024.

Issues

Whether the delay of 110 days in filing the review petition should be condoned. Whether the review petition is maintainable on merits.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Delay was due to pursuing matters before various forums after the Supreme Court order; review petition is maintainable as per Khoday Distilleries Limited; there is an error apparent on record. Respondent No.1: The order has attained finality after Supreme Court confirmation; no error apparent on record; no adjudication on merits in the original order; delay not sufficiently explained.

Ratio Decidendi

Orders passed in independent proceedings after the Supreme Court's dismissal of SLP do not constitute sufficient cause for condoning delay in filing a review petition against the original order. A review petition cannot be entertained to quash an order that has attained finality, especially when no error apparent on record is shown.

Judgment Excerpts

In our view, orders passed by the Co-operative Court rejecting the review application, interim order passed in Civil Writ Petition No.5939 of 2024 and order passed in Criminal Writ Petition No.1399 of 2016 cannot constitute reasonable cause in the facts of the present case for the delay in filing the present review petition. The order dated 20th February 2024 has therefore reached finality. The Petitioner has failed to show any mistake apparent from record insofar as, our order dated 20th February 2024 is concerned, so as to exercise our jurisdiction.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition (L) No.23115 of 2023 (later numbered as Writ Petition No.1518 of 2024) which was dismissed on 20th February 2024. The petitioner challenged this before the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No(s).8543-8544 of 2024, which was dismissed on 3rd May 2024. Subsequently, the Co-operative Appellate Court rejected the petitioner's review application on 2nd March 2024. A Single Judge of this Court passed an interim order in Civil Writ Petition No.5939 of 2024 on 14th June 2024. A Co-ordinate Bench clarified an order in Criminal Writ Petition No.1399 of 2016 on 18th June 2024. The petitioner then filed the present review petition on an unspecified date with an interim application for condonation of delay of 110 days.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925:
  • Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Non-Compliance with Award or Possession Requirements.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Notice to Reopen Caste Validity Certificates — Committee Lacks Power of Review in Absence of Statutory Provision. The court held that the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny C...