Case Note & Summary
The case concerned the appointment, regularization, salary stoppage, and termination of an ad hoc lecturer in a postgraduate college affiliated to Gorakhpur University, governed by the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973. The appellant had been appointed as lecturer in Agronomy on 1 January 1984 by the management of Shri Durgaji Post Graduate College, Chandeshwar, while he was still a final year M.Sc. (Agriculture) student. The college was unaided at the time. The State Government had sanctioned M.Sc. (Agronomy) in July 1982, and the college advertised the post on 15 December 1983 with a stipulation that the management could relax educational qualifications. The appellant applied on 20 December 1983, disclosed his status as a gold medalist in B.Sc. and continuing final year M.Sc., and was appointed by letter dated 1 January 1984. He passed the final year M.Sc. examination on 18 January 1985. The Manager of the College requested the Higher Education Services Commission to select a candidate in May 1985, but when no name was sent, a fresh advertisement was issued on 12 August 1985. The appellant applied, and a Selection Committee with a Vice-Chancellor-nominated expert unanimously selected him. The Registrar approved his ad hoc appointment for six months. Subsequently, the Director of Education communicated approval for creation of a post under Sections 60(A) and 60(B) of the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973, subject to the post being sent to the Service Commission. The Vice-Chancellor granted repeated ad hoc approvals with breaks. Meanwhile, Ordinance No.14 of 1985 was promulgated for regularization of ad hoc teachers, and Section 31B was added to the Act. The Director of Higher Education regularized the appellant's services under the Ordinance, and salary payment was directed. However, by letter dated 4 May 1987, the Director asked the Principal to stop the appellant's salary and produce his certificates. The appellant filed Writ Petition No.2137 of 1988 in the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of salary. On 25 February 1988, the Director cancelled the regularization on the ground that the appointment was invalid and approval had been obtained on a wrong premise. The Manager terminated the appellant's services on 29 February 1988. The appellant amended the writ petition to challenge the termination and cancellation of regularization. The Deputy Registrar of the University later questioned the termination for lack of prior approval of the Vice-Chancellor. The legal issues arising were the validity of the initial appointment without final qualification, the validity and revocability of regularization under Section 31B, the authority of the Director to stop salary and cancel regularization, and the procedural validity of termination without Vice-Chancellor's approval. The appellant contended that his appointment was valid, he had completed his qualification, was selected through a proper committee, and his services were regularized; therefore salary stoppage and termination were illegal. The State authorities considered the appointment invalid and approval obtained on wrong premises. The provided excerpt of the judgment ends abruptly before the court's analysis and final decision, so no ratio decidendi or operative order can be extracted.
Headnote
A) Service Law - Appointment of Ad Hoc Lecturer - Educational Qualification - Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973, Sections 60(A), 60(B) - The appellant was appointed as lecturer in Agronomy on 1.1.1984 while still a final year M.Sc. student after the management advertised the post with power to relax qualifications; he passed M.Sc. on 18.1.1985. The legal issue concerned whether such appointment was valid. The provided judgment excerpt does not include the court's reasoning or final direction (Held not mentioned). B) Service Law - Regularization of Ad Hoc Teachers - Ordinance No.14 of 1985 and Section 31B - Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973, Section 31B - The Director of Higher Education initially regularized the appellant's services under the Ordinance but later cancelled the regularization on the ground that the appointment was invalid and approval obtained on a wrong premise. The issue concerned the validity and revocability of regularization. The provided judgment excerpt does not include the court's reasoning or final direction (Held not mentioned). C) Service Law - Termination of Ad Hoc Lecturer - Prior Approval of Vice-Chancellor - Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 (section not specified) - The Manager terminated the appellant's services on 29.2.1988 after the Director's cancellation order; the University subsequently questioned whether termination required prior approval of the Vice-Chancellor. The issue concerned procedural validity of termination. The provided judgment excerpt does not include the court's reasoning or final direction (Held not mentioned).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the appointment of the appellant as lecturer in Agronomy while still a final year M.Sc. student was valid; whether regularization of his services under Ordinance No.14 of 1985/Section 31B was valid; whether the Director of Higher Education could stop salary and cancel regularization; whether termination without prior approval of Vice-Chancellor was legal.
Final Decision
Not mentioned in the provided excerpt; the judgment text ends before the final holding.
Law Points
- Validity of appointment of ad hoc lecturer lacking final qualification
- regularization under Section 31B of Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act
- 1973
- cancellation of regularization
- termination without prior approval of Vice-Chancellor
- judicial review of salary stoppage



