Supreme Court Reviews Challenge to Termination and Cancellation of Regularization of Ad Hoc Lecturer under Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973. Appointment Validity and Approval by Vice-Chancellor under Section 31B Were Core Issues.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case concerned the appointment, regularization, salary stoppage, and termination of an ad hoc lecturer in a postgraduate college affiliated to Gorakhpur University, governed by the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973. The appellant had been appointed as lecturer in Agronomy on 1 January 1984 by the management of Shri Durgaji Post Graduate College, Chandeshwar, while he was still a final year M.Sc. (Agriculture) student. The college was unaided at the time. The State Government had sanctioned M.Sc. (Agronomy) in July 1982, and the college advertised the post on 15 December 1983 with a stipulation that the management could relax educational qualifications. The appellant applied on 20 December 1983, disclosed his status as a gold medalist in B.Sc. and continuing final year M.Sc., and was appointed by letter dated 1 January 1984. He passed the final year M.Sc. examination on 18 January 1985. The Manager of the College requested the Higher Education Services Commission to select a candidate in May 1985, but when no name was sent, a fresh advertisement was issued on 12 August 1985. The appellant applied, and a Selection Committee with a Vice-Chancellor-nominated expert unanimously selected him. The Registrar approved his ad hoc appointment for six months. Subsequently, the Director of Education communicated approval for creation of a post under Sections 60(A) and 60(B) of the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973, subject to the post being sent to the Service Commission. The Vice-Chancellor granted repeated ad hoc approvals with breaks. Meanwhile, Ordinance No.14 of 1985 was promulgated for regularization of ad hoc teachers, and Section 31B was added to the Act. The Director of Higher Education regularized the appellant's services under the Ordinance, and salary payment was directed. However, by letter dated 4 May 1987, the Director asked the Principal to stop the appellant's salary and produce his certificates. The appellant filed Writ Petition No.2137 of 1988 in the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of salary. On 25 February 1988, the Director cancelled the regularization on the ground that the appointment was invalid and approval had been obtained on a wrong premise. The Manager terminated the appellant's services on 29 February 1988. The appellant amended the writ petition to challenge the termination and cancellation of regularization. The Deputy Registrar of the University later questioned the termination for lack of prior approval of the Vice-Chancellor. The legal issues arising were the validity of the initial appointment without final qualification, the validity and revocability of regularization under Section 31B, the authority of the Director to stop salary and cancel regularization, and the procedural validity of termination without Vice-Chancellor's approval. The appellant contended that his appointment was valid, he had completed his qualification, was selected through a proper committee, and his services were regularized; therefore salary stoppage and termination were illegal. The State authorities considered the appointment invalid and approval obtained on wrong premises. The provided excerpt of the judgment ends abruptly before the court's analysis and final decision, so no ratio decidendi or operative order can be extracted.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Appointment of Ad Hoc Lecturer - Educational Qualification - Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973, Sections 60(A), 60(B) - The appellant was appointed as lecturer in Agronomy on 1.1.1984 while still a final year M.Sc. student after the management advertised the post with power to relax qualifications; he passed M.Sc. on 18.1.1985. The legal issue concerned whether such appointment was valid. The provided judgment excerpt does not include the court's reasoning or final direction (Held not mentioned).

B) Service Law - Regularization of Ad Hoc Teachers - Ordinance No.14 of 1985 and Section 31B - Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973, Section 31B - The Director of Higher Education initially regularized the appellant's services under the Ordinance but later cancelled the regularization on the ground that the appointment was invalid and approval obtained on a wrong premise. The issue concerned the validity and revocability of regularization. The provided judgment excerpt does not include the court's reasoning or final direction (Held not mentioned).

C) Service Law - Termination of Ad Hoc Lecturer - Prior Approval of Vice-Chancellor - Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 (section not specified) - The Manager terminated the appellant's services on 29.2.1988 after the Director's cancellation order; the University subsequently questioned whether termination required prior approval of the Vice-Chancellor. The issue concerned procedural validity of termination. The provided judgment excerpt does not include the court's reasoning or final direction (Held not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointment of the appellant as lecturer in Agronomy while still a final year M.Sc. student was valid; whether regularization of his services under Ordinance No.14 of 1985/Section 31B was valid; whether the Director of Higher Education could stop salary and cancel regularization; whether termination without prior approval of Vice-Chancellor was legal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Not mentioned in the provided excerpt; the judgment text ends before the final holding.

Law Points

  • Validity of appointment of ad hoc lecturer lacking final qualification
  • regularization under Section 31B of Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act
  • 1973
  • cancellation of regularization
  • termination without prior approval of Vice-Chancellor
  • judicial review of salary stoppage
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1995 LawText (SC) (12) 62

1995-12-12

G.B. Pattanaik, S.C. Agrawal

1996 SCC (2) 45, JT 1995 (9) 530, 1995 SCALE (7)281

Santosh Kumar Singh

The State of U.P. & Ors. Etc.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Service matter concerning appointment, regularization, salary stoppage, and termination of an ad hoc lecturer in an affiliated college under the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought payment of salary and quashing of orders stopping salary, cancelling regularization, and terminating his services; the appeals before the Supreme Court related to those proceedings.

Filing Reason

Director of Higher Education stopped appellant's salary by letter dated 4.5.1987 and later cancelled regularization by letter dated 25.2.1988; Manager terminated services on 29.2.1988.

Previous Decisions

Allahabad High Court proceedings were initiated under Writ Petition No.2137 of 1988 but no decision is mentioned in the provided excerpt; the appeals to the Supreme Court arose thereafter.

Issues

Validity of appointment of appellant as lecturer in Agronomy before completing M.Sc. Validity of regularization of appellant's services under Ordinance No.14 of 1985/Section 31B. Authority of Director of Higher Education to stop salary and cancel regularization. Validity of termination without prior approval of Vice-Chancellor.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that his appointment was valid, he had completed his qualification, was selected through a proper committee with Vice-Chancellor-nominated expert, and his services were regularized under Section 31B; therefore salary stoppage and termination were illegal. State authorities (Director of Higher Education) treated the appointment as invalid and approval as obtained on a wrong premise, leading to cancellation of regularization and termination.

Ratio Decidendi

Not mentioned in the provided excerpt.

Judgment Excerpts

It was stipulated in the advertisement that the Management has the power to grant any relaxation in the educational qualification. The Management of the College informed the appellant by letter dated 1.1.1984 that he has been appointed as a lecturer in the Post Graduate Agronomy Department and he should join the College. The Selection Committee unanimously selected the appellant for the post of lecturer and the Manager of the College write to the Registrar of the University by his letter dated 23.9.1985 informing that the appellant has been unanimously selected and the appointment may be approved. The Director of Higher Education U.P. then issued a letter dated 4th May, 1987 to the Principal of the College calling upon the Principal to come to the Directorate with the copies of the certificates and the mark sheets of the appellant and it was also stated in the said letter that the salary of the appellant should be stopped at once.

Procedural History

The State Government sanctioned M.Sc. (Agronomy) for the college on 31.7.1982. The college advertised the post of lecturer in Agronomy on 15.12.1983. The appellant applied on 20.12.1983 and was appointed on 1.1.1984. He passed M.Sc. on 18.1.1985. The Manager requested the Higher Education Services Commission for selection on 21.5.1985. After no response, a fresh advertisement was issued on 12.8.1985. The Selection Committee selected the appellant on 23.9.1985, and the University approved ad hoc appointment for six months. The Director of Education communicated approval for creation of a post under Sections 60(A) and 60(B) of the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973. Further ad hoc approvals were granted by the Vice-Chancellor with breaks. Ordinance No.14 of 1985 was promulgated for regularization, and Section 31B was added. The Director of Higher Education regularized the appellant's services and directed salary payment. On 4.5.1987, the Director ordered salary stoppage. The appellant filed Writ Petition No.2137 of 1988 in Allahabad High Court. On 25.2.1988, the Director cancelled regularization, and on 29.2.1988, the Manager terminated the appellant. The appellant amended the writ petition to challenge termination and cancellation. The Deputy Registrar of the University questioned the termination on 22.4.1989 for lack of Vice-Chancellor's prior approval. The appeals before the Supreme Court followed.

Acts & Sections

  • Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973: Section 60(A), Section 60(B), Section 31B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Second Appeals in Specific Performance Cases, Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Condonation of Delay and Setting Aside Abatement to Advance Substantial Justice. The Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of substitution and co...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Permanent Injunction Denied Due to Failure to Prove Title & Property Identity: Supreme Court Restores Trial Court Judgment (2025 INSC 1450)