Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals as Abated Under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972. Pending Proceedings for Surplus Land Determination Under Principal Act Stood Abated Under Section 19, and Prescribed Authority Was Required to Start Afresh Under Section 9(2) as Amended.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising out of proceedings under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. The State of Uttar Pradesh and the aggrieved persons had come before the Court against orders of prescribed authorities regarding determination of ceiling area. Under Section 10 of the Principal Act, proceedings were initiated and ceiling area was determined, but a controversy arose as to the extent of the ceiling area required to be retained by the respondent and the surplus land that stood vested in the State. Before the filing of the appeals, the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972 (Act 18 of 1973) came into force with effect from June 8, 1973. Section 19 of the Amendment Act contained transitory provisions stating that all proceedings for determination of surplus land under Sections 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 or 30 of the Principal Act pending before any court or authority at the commencement of the Amendment Act shall abate, and the prescribed authority shall start proceedings afresh by issuing a notice under sub-section (2) of Section 9 of the Amended Act. The proviso prescribed that ceiling area be first determined under the unamended Principal Act and then redetermined under the amended Act. The prescribed authority had, by order dated 24.2.1975, redetermined the ceiling area as per the Amendment Act. The Supreme Court observed that the question whether that redetermination was in accordance with law was not in controversy before it, as the proceedings had to be taken under the Amendment Act. It held that as a consequence of Section 19, the appeals before it stood abated. Accordingly, the appeals were dismissed without costs, and the Court left it open to the State or the persons concerned to pursue remedies according to law regarding the redetermination.

Headnote

A) Land Ceiling - Abatement of Pending Proceedings - Transitory Provisions - U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972, Section 19 - Section 19 provides that all proceedings for determination of surplus land under Sections 9 to 13 and 30 of the Principal Act pending before any court or authority at the commencement of the Amendment Act shall abate. The Supreme Court applied this provision and held that the appeals before it, which arose from ceiling area determination proceedings, stood abated. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed without costs.

B) Land Ceiling - Redetermination Procedure - Manner of Determination - U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972, Section 19 proviso - The proviso to Section 19(1) mandates that ceiling area be first determined under the unamended Principal Act, then redetermined under the amended Act. The prescribed authority had already redetermined the ceiling area by order dated 24.2.1975, and the Court left it open to the parties to pursue remedies according to law regarding the correctness of that redetermination.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether all proceedings for determination of surplus land under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 pending at the commencement of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972 stood abated under Section 19, and whether the appeals pending before the Supreme Court also stood abated.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court held that as a consequence of Section 19 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972, the appeals before it stood abated. The appeals were dismissed without costs, and the State or the persons concerned were left free to pursue remedies according to law regarding the redetermination under the Amendment Act.

Law Points

  • All pending proceedings for determination of surplus land under Sections 9 to 13 and 30 of U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act
  • 1960 shall abate upon commencement of U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act
  • 1972
  • Prescribed authority must start afresh by issuing notice under Section 9(2) as amended
  • Ceiling area first determined under unamended Principal Act then redetermined under amended Act
  • Appeals arising from such abated proceedings also stand abated.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1995 LawText (SC) (12) 33

Civil Appeal No.1383 of 1978 and connected appeal

1995-12-14

K. Ramaswamy, B.L. Hansaria

1996 SCC (1) 704, 1996 SCALE (1)1

State of U.P. etc.

Madho Kumar Swarup & Ors. etc.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals before the Supreme Court against orders of prescribed authorities under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 regarding determination of ceiling area and surplus land.

Remedy Sought

The State of U.P. and the aggrieved persons sought adjudication on the extent of ceiling area required to be retained and the surplus land vested in the State.

Filing Reason

A controversy arose as to the extent of ceiling area to be retained by the respondent and the surplus land that stood vested in the State after proceedings initiated under Section 10 of the Principal Act.

Previous Decisions

The prescribed authority determined ceiling area and, by order dated 24.2.1975, redetermined the ceiling area in accordance with the Amendment Act. The correctness of that redetermination was not in controversy before the Supreme Court.

Issues

Whether all proceedings for determination of surplus land under Sections 9 to 13 and Section 30 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 pending before any court or authority at the commencement of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972 stood abated under Section 19. Whether the appeals pending before the Supreme Court arising out of such ceiling determination proceedings also stood abated.

Submissions/Arguments

Arguments of the parties were not detailed in the judgment text.

Ratio Decidendi

All proceedings for the determination of surplus land under Sections 9 to 13 and Section 30 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 pending before any court or authority at the time of commencement of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972 shall abate. The prescribed authority must start proceedings afresh by issuing a notice under Section 9(2) as amended. Ceiling area shall be determined first under the unamended Principal Act, and then redetermined under the amended Act. Appeals arising from such abated proceedings also stand abated.

Judgment Excerpts

All proceedings for the determination of surplus land under Section 9, Section 10, Section 11, Section 12, Section 13 or Section 30 of the Principal Act, pending before any court or authority at the time of the commencement of this Act, shall abate and the prescribed authority shall start the proceedings for determination of the ceiling area under that Act afresh by issue of a notice under sub-section (2) of Section 9 of that Act as inserted by this Act. As regards the appeals at hand, as a consequence of Section 19, they stand abated. The appeals are accordingly dismissed but, in the circumstances, without costs.

Procedural History

Proceedings were initiated under Section 10 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 and ceiling area was determined. A controversy arose as to the extent of ceiling area and surplus land vested in the State. The U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972 came into force on June 8, 1973. The prescribed authority passed an order dated 24.2.1975 redetermining the ceiling area under the Amendment Act. Civil Appeal No.1383 of 1978 and a connected appeal were filed before the Supreme Court. On December 14, 1995, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeals as abated under Section 19 without costs.

Acts & Sections

  • U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960: Section 9, Section 10, Section 11, Section 12, Section 13, Section 30
  • U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972 (Act 18 of 1973): Section 19
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging ICC Report Omission in POSH Act Case — Petitioner's Grievance Limited to Non-Naming of Alleged Instigator, Not Maintainable Under Article 226. The court held that the ICC's omission to...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Plaintiffs in Suit for Injunction Due to Failure to Establish Lawful Possession. Trial Court's Examination of Gift Deed Validity and Title Was Not Beyond the Scope of an Injunction Suit Under the Princi...