Supreme Court Reviews High Court Ruling on Charitable Trust Exemption under Income Tax Act, 1922 and 1961. Rectification Decrees and Public Charity Object Clauses Interpreted in Context of Assessee Trust.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute concerned the income tax exemption claimed by a trust created by a deed dated 27.10.1941 executed between a company and three trustees. The trust was settled on two plots of land demised by the Improvement Trust, Kanpur, for the welfare of workmen and the public. The original trust deed contained objects that were later found to be less comprehensive than intended, leading to two rectification suits. The first suit, No. 40 of 1945, resulted in a decree dated 18.8.1945 rectifying the deed. However, in the case of J.K. Hosiery Factory v. Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P. (1971) 81 I.T.R. 557, the Allahabad High Court held that the rectified objects did not create a public charitable trust because they were a mixture of charitable and non-charitable objects. The settlor company then filed a second suit, No. 163 of 1954, which was decreed on 10.5.1955, further rectifying the trust deed to reflect an intention to create a wholly public charitable trust. The assessee trust claimed exemption from income tax for assessment years 1949-50 to 1965-66 under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, and under Section 11 read with Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals for assessment years 1949-50 to 1955-56 but allowed them for 1956-57 to 1965-66, subject to a rider on accumulation under Section 11(1)(a) for the years 1962-63 to 1965-66. Both the Revenue and the assessee sought reference to the High Court under Section 256(1) of the 1961 Act. Seven questions were referred, covering whether the trust was a public charitable trust, the effect of the second rectification decree, the validity of the settlor company's memorandum provisions, the bar of Section 11 and Order 2 Rule 2 CPC, the applicability of the first limb of charitable purpose, uncertainty of the trust deed, and whether the Income Tax Officer could go behind the civil court decree. The Allahabad High Court by judgment dated 20.2.1975 answered all questions in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Revenue then filed 17 appeals by special leave before the Supreme Court. At final hearing, the Revenue highlighted grievances only against the answers to Questions 1 and 2 raised by the assessee and Questions (d) and (e) raised by the Revenue. The provided text ends before the Supreme Court's final decision, so the operative holding is not stated. Based on the available excerpt, the High Court had accepted the rectification decrees as valid and binding on the Income Tax Officer and had held the trust to be a public charitable trust eligible for exemption, but the final appellate outcome is not contained in the text.

Headnote

A) Income Tax Law - Charitable Trust Exemption - Section 4(3)(i) of Income Tax Act, 1922 - Assessee trust claimed exemption for assessment years 1949-50 to 1955-56; Tribunal held trust not public charitable and denied exemption, but High Court answered referred question in favour of assessee; Revenue appealed to Supreme Court challenging this answer; final holding not available in provided text (Paras 1-5).

B) Civil Procedure - Rectification of Trust Deed - Section 31 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Second rectification decree dated 10.5.1955 in Suit No.163 of 1954 - Issue whether decree operated prospectively from assessment year 1956-57 or retrospectively from date of execution; High Court held in favour of assessee and Revenue challenged; final holding not available (Paras 2-5).

C) Income Tax Law - Definition of Charitable Purpose - Section 2(15) of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Question whether objects and activities of trust fell within first limb of charitable purpose for assessment years 1962-63 to 1965-66; High Court answered in favour of assessee; Revenue did not highlight this aspect in final hearing as per excerpt; final outcome not available (Paras 2-6).

D) Civil Procedure - Binding Effect of Civil Court Decree - Section 11 and Order 2 Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Issue whether Income Tax Officer could go behind civil court decree dated 10.5.1955 and adjudge validity of rectification; High Court held decree binding and answered against Revenue; Supreme Court final decision not provided (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent-assessee trust was entitled to income tax exemption as a public charitable trust under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 and under Section 11 read with Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 1949-50 to 1965-66, particularly in light of two rectification decrees dated 18.8.1945 and 10.5.1955.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Charitable trust exemption under Section 4(3)(i) of Income Tax Act
  • 1922
  • Exemption under Section 11 read with Section 2(15) of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Rectification of trust deed under Section 31 of Specific Relief Act
  • 1877
  • Income Tax Officer cannot go behind civil court decree
  • Public charitable trust must have wholly charitable objects
  • Accumulation limit under Section 11(1)(a) of Income Tax Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1995 LawText (SC) (11) 94

1995-11-16

S.B. Majmudar, B.P. Jeevan Reddy

1996 AIR 620, 1996 SCC (7) 349, JT 1995 (8) 364, 1995 SCALE (6)517

Commissioner of Income Tax, Kanpur

Kamla Town Trust

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income tax appeals by Revenue against High Court answers in references concerning exemption of assessee trust from income tax for assessment years 1949-50 to 1965-66 under Section 4(3)(i) of Income Tax Act, 1922 and Section 11 read with Section 2(15) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

Appellant-Commissioner of Income Tax sought to set aside High Court judgment and hold that respondent-assessee was not entitled to income tax exemption as a public charitable trust.

Filing Reason

Dispute over whether trust income was exempt from tax; High Court answered all referred questions in favour of assessee, aggrieved by which Revenue filed appeals by special leave.

Previous Decisions

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed assessee's appeals for assessment years 1949-50 to 1955-56 but allowed for 1956-57 to 1965-66 with rider on accumulation limit; Allahabad High Court answered all referred questions in favour of assessee.

Issues

Whether the assessee was not a public charitable trust and its income was not exempt under Section 4(3)(i) of Income Tax Act, 1922 for assessment years 1949-50 to 1955-56. Whether the second rectification decree dated 10.5.1955 in suit no.163 of 1954 operated prospectively from assessment year 1956-57 and did not rectify the trust deed from the date of its execution. Whether the unamended clause 3(19) of the Memorandum of Association of the settlor company empowered it to create a public charitable trust and insertion of sub-section (22) was a matter of abundant caution. Whether the Revenue could object in the proceedings that the second rectification suit was barred by Section 11 and Order 2 Rule 2 of CPC. Whether the objects and activities of the trust fell within first limb of definition of charitable purpose in Section 2(15) of the 1961 Act for assessment years 1962-63 to 1965-66. Whether the trust deed as amended by second rectification decree dated 10.5.1955 was void for uncertainty and not a public charitable trust. Whether the Income Tax Officer was entitled to go behind the civil court decree dated 10.5.1955 and adjudge validity of rectification.

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue contended that High Court erred in answering questions 1 and 2 and (d) and (e) in favour of assessee; argued trust not public charitable and civil court rectification decree invalid or ineffective for tax purposes. Assessee contended that trust deed as rectified created public charitable trust and rectification decree was valid and binding; income exempt under relevant provisions.

Judgment Excerpts

The assessee is a trust created by a trust deed dated 27.10.1941 executed between M/s. J.K. Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd., Kanpur (hereinafter called 'the company') of the one part and Sir Padampat Singhania, Lala Kailashpat Singhania and Lala Laxmipat Singhania (hereinafter called 'the trustees') of the other part. The Division Bench of the High Court after hearing the rival contentions canvassed by the parties answered all the referred questions in favour of the respondent-assessee and against the Revenue. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee was not a public charitable trust and its income was not exempt under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, for the assessment years 1949-50 to 1955-56? Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Officer was entitled to go behind the civil court decree dated 10.5.1955 in suit No.163 of 1954 and adjudge the validity of the rectification?

Procedural History

Trust deed dated 27.10.1941 executed by settlor company and trustees. Suit No.40 of 1945 filed for rectification; decree dated 18.8.1945 rectified deed. Allahabad High Court in J.K. Hosiery Factory v. CIT (1971) 81 ITR 557 held rectification valid but objects not public charitable. Second suit No.163 of 1954 filed; decree dated 10.5.1955 further rectified deed. Assessment proceedings for years 1949-50 to 1965-66 led to appeals before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which dismissed assessee's appeals for 1949-50 to 1955-56 and allowed for 1956-57 to 1965-66 with accumulation rider. Both parties filed reference applications under Section 256(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961; seven questions referred to Allahabad High Court. High Court by judgment dated 20.2.1975 answered all questions in favour of assessee. Revenue filed 17 appeals by special leave before Supreme Court. Supreme Court heard appeals together; judgment date 16.11.1995, but final decision not included in provided text.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1922: Section 4(3)(i)
  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 2(15), Section 11, Section 256(1), Section 11(1)(a)
  • Specific Relief Act, 1877: Section 31
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 11, Order 1 Rule 8, Order 2 Rule 2
  • Indian Companies Act, 1913:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Council in M.P. Municipalities Act Fee Recovery; Contractor's Challenge Rejected for Lack of Locus Standi and Valid Quid Pro Quo. Cattle Registration Fee and Market Fee Held Valid Under Section 164 of M.P. Municipaliti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Revision in Income Tax Prosecution and Quashes Sessions Court Order Adding Partners as Accused Without Sanction Under Section 279 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 319 CrPC Application Fails as Prior Order Treating Pa...