Supreme Court Reviews Election Commission's Order Withdrawing National Party Recognition Under Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968. Commission Reasoning that Political Party Must Show Continued Minimum Electoral Support and Cannot Claim Recognition in Perpetuity is Central to Dispute.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This appeal before the Supreme Court of India questioned the validity of an order dated 21.2.1992 passed by the Chief Election Commissioner of India withdrawing the recognition of Janata Dal (Samajwadi) as a national political party under paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968. The appellant was recognized as a national political party on 16.4.1991 after fulfilling the prescribed conditions. Subsequently, general elections to the Lok Sabha and to the Legislative Assemblies of Assam, Haryana, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and the Union Territory of Pondicherry were held in April-June 1991. Based on the appellant's electoral performance in these elections, the Election Commission issued a show cause notice dated 4.12.1991 asking why recognition should not be withdrawn. The appellant sought time and filed reply on 5.2.1992, contending that once recognition is granted there is no provision for withdrawal and that performance should be judged only after elections in all states, not some. The Election Commission, however, held that recognition is not perpetual and that a party must demonstrate minimum electoral support for continued recognition under paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Symbols Order. Consequently, the Commission withdrew recognition and forfeited the party's exclusive right to use the symbol 'Woman carrying pot on her head'. The legal issues revolved around the interpretation of paragraphs 6 and 7: whether the Commission has power to derecognize a national party based on subsequent election results; whether recognition once granted is perpetual; and whether a review of recognition requires elections in all states. The text provided does not include the Supreme Court's final decision, but the dispute centered on the scope of the Commission's power under the Election Symbols Order and the criteria for national party status under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Symbols Order. The Court was required to examine the statutory framework, including the definition of political party under Section 29A, registration requirements, classification of recognized political parties, and the conditions for national and state party status. The procedural history shows that after the show cause notice and reply, the impugned order was passed, leading to the present appeal.

Headnote

A) Election Law - National Party Recognition - Derecognition - Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, Paras 6 & 7 - Appellant recognized as national party on 16.4.1991; after general elections in some states, Election Commission issued show cause notice and withdrew recognition on 21.2.1992 for failure to maintain minimum electoral support; held by Commission that recognition is not perpetual and party must satisfy conditions for continued recognition (Paras 1-7).

B) Election Law - Interpretation of 'General Election' for Recognition - Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, Paras 6 & 7 - Appellant contended that performance should be judged when elections held in all states, not only some states; Commission's order based on election results in states where elections were held; legal question whether partial state elections suffice for reviewing national party status (Paras 1-7).

C) Constitutional Law - Powers of Election Commission - Representation of the People Act, 1951, Section 29A; Election Symbols Order, Paras 6 & 7 - Appellant argued no provision for withdrawal after recognition; Commission asserted power under Paras 6 and 7; issue of whether power includes derecognition upon subsequent performance (Paras 1-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Election Commission has power under Paragraphs 6 and 7 of Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 to withdraw recognition of a political party as a national party based on subsequent electoral performance; whether recognition once granted is perpetual; whether performance must be assessed on elections in all states or only states where elections were held

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Not mentioned in provided text; the extracted portion ends before the Supreme Court's final holding. The Election Commission's impugned order withdrew recognition and forfeited the symbol, but the Supreme Court's outcome is not stated in the extract.

Law Points

  • Classification of political parties under Paras 6 and 7 of Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order
  • 1968
  • registered political party under Section 29A of Representation of the People Act
  • 1951
  • national party status requires recognition in four or more states
  • recognition not perpetual
  • minimum electoral support required for continued recognition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1995 LawText (SC) (11) 64

1995-11-23

N.P. Singh, Jagdish Saran Verma, K. Venkataswami

1996 AIR 577, 1996 SCC (1) 235, JT 1995 (8) 238, 1995 SCALE (6)558

Janata Dal (Samajwadi)

The Election Commission of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal before Supreme Court challenging order of Election Commission withdrawing recognition of Janata Dal (Samajwadi) as national party under Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought quashing of Election Commission order dated 21.2.1992 and restoration of status as national party with exclusive use of symbol 'Woman carrying pot on her head'.

Filing Reason

Election Commission issued show cause notice after appellant's poor electoral performance in general elections to Lok Sabha and certain State Legislative Assemblies held in April-June 1991; subsequent order withdrew recognition.

Previous Decisions

Election Commission passed impugned order on 21.2.1992 withdrawing recognition and forfeiting exclusive symbol; no other prior court decision mentioned.

Issues

Whether Election Commission has power under Paragraphs 6 and 7 of Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 to withdraw recognition of a political party as a national party based on subsequent electoral performance. Whether recognition once granted as national party is perpetual or subject to review based on subsequent election results. Whether performance for recognition should be assessed on the basis of elections in all states or only states where elections were held.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that once recognition has been given as national party, there is no provision in Symbols Order for withdrawal of said recognition. Appellant argued that performance for recognition or derecognition should be judged when elections are held in all States within Union of India, not only on basis of elections held in some States. Appellant sought time to collect information from State units before replying to show cause notice. Election Commission held that a party once recognised cannot claim recognition in perpetuity and must show minimum electoral support for continued recognition under Paras 6 and 7.

Ratio Decidendi

Not explicitly stated in provided text; the dispute involves whether Paras 6 and 7 of Election Symbols Order empower Election Commission to derecognize a national party that no longer fulfills conditions after subsequent general elections.

Judgment Excerpts

The validity of an order dated 21.2.1992 passed by the Chief Election Commissioner of India withdrawing the recognition of Janata Dal (Samajwadi) as a national party ... is being questioned in this appeal. A party once recognised cannot claim the recognition in perpetuity and it has to show a minimum electoral support for continued recognition in terms of paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Symbols Order.

Procedural History

Appellant was recognised as national political party on 16.4.1991. General elections to Lok Sabha and some State Legislative Assemblies held April-June 1991. Election Commission prepared vote statement; show cause notice dated 4.12.1991 issued; appellant sought time, reply filed 5.2.1992; impugned order dated 21.2.1992 withdrew recognition and forfeited symbol. Appeal filed in Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968: Paragraph 2(h), Paragraph 3, Paragraph 6, Paragraph 7
  • Representation of the People Act, 1951: Section 29A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Municipal Election Result Due to Minor Name Discrepancy. Variation in Name Between Electoral Roll and Nomination Form Does Not Constitute Corrupt Practice Under Section 33 of Mumbai Municipal ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Examines Migrant Scheduled Caste/Tribe Benefits Under Articles 341 and 342 of Constitution in Article 32 PIL. The Court Analyzed Whether Maharashtra Denial of Benefits to Migrant SC/ST Violates Fundamental Rights and Presidential Orders...