Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Land Acquisition Matter — Proceedings Lapsed Under Section 11-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Award Not Made Within Two Years of Commencement of Amendment Act 68 of 1984 Renders Notifications Under Sections 4 and 6 Non-Subsisting.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellant, Nahar Singh, challenged the subsistence of notifications issued under Sections 4(1) and 6 of the Act, contending that the proceedings had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 11-A. The respondent was the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. A notification under Section 4(1) was published on June 25, 1974, followed by a declaration under Section 6 on July 3, 1974, after the Governor exercised power under Section 17(4) to dispense with the enquiry under Section 5-A. The record did not clearly establish that possession of the land was taken after the required notice under Section 9. The appellant asserted continued possession and placed on record a resolution of the Gram Sabha dated December 27, 1977, stating that the land was no longer necessary since other land had already been allotted to 30 eligible persons. The respondent did not file a counter to rebut these assertions. After the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 (Act 68 of 1984) came into force on September 24, 1984, Section 11-A applied, providing that if an award under Section 11 was not made within two years from the date of commencement of the amendment, all proceedings under Sections 4 and 6 would lapse. The court found that no steps appeared to have been taken within time to make the award. Consequently, the court held that the notification under Section 4(1) and the declaration under Section 6 no longer subsisted. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, without costs.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Lapse of Proceedings - Section 11-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Award not made within two years of commencement of Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 results in lapse of all proceedings under Sections 4 and 6. The court found that after the amendment came into force on September 24, 1984, no award under Section 11 was made within two years, and no steps appeared to have been taken within time. The appellant asserted continued possession and placed Gram Sabha resolution dated December 27, 1977 stating land no longer necessary, and the respondent did not file a counter. Held that the notification under Section 4(1) and declaration under Section 6 no longer subsist and the appeal is allowed without costs.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 due to failure to make an award within two years from the commencement of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The notification under Section 4(1) and declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 no longer subsist. No costs.

Law Points

  • Section 11-A of Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
  • lapse of proceedings if award not made within two years
  • notifications under Sections 4 and 6 lapse
  • possession not proven
  • Amendment Act 68 of 1984
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1995 LawText (SC) (11) 37

1995-11-28

K. Ramaswamy, S.B. Majmudar

1996 SCC (1) 434, JT 1995 (9) 135, 1995 SCALE (6) 773

Nahar Singh

State of U.P. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against land acquisition proceedings; challenge to lapse of notifications due to non-making of award under Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought declaration that land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and that possession remained with him.

Filing Reason

Land acquisition notifications under Sections 4 and 6 were issued in 1974, but award was not made within prescribed time after the 1984 amendment.

Issues

Whether land acquisition proceedings under Sections 4 and 6 lapsed under Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as amended by Act 68 of 1984, due to failure to make award within two years of the amendment's commencement.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that possession remained with him and no steps were taken for making the award within time. Appellant placed on record Gram Sabha resolution dated December 27, 1977 stating that the land in question was no longer necessary as other land had been allotted to 30 eligible persons. Respondent did not file a counter to rebut the appellant's possession claim.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, if an award under Section 11 is not made within two years from the commencement of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 (Act 68 of 1984), all proceedings under Sections 4 and 6 lapse. The court found that no steps appeared to have been taken within time, so the notification under Section 4(1) and declaration under Section 6 no longer subsisted.

Judgment Excerpts

After the Amendment Act 68 of 1984 was brought into force w.e.f. September 24, 1984, Section 11-A operates in the field. It envisages that if the award under Section 11 has not been made within two years from the date of coming into force of the Amendent Act, all the proceedings under Sections 4 and 6 shall stand lapsed. In view of the fact that no steps appeared to have been taken within time, the notification under Section 4 (1) and declaration under Section 6 no longer subsist. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. No costs.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 published on June 25, 1974. Declaration under Section 6 published on July 3, 1974, dispensing with enquiry under Section 5-A after Governor exercised power under Section 17(4). Possession of land not clearly established. After Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 came into force on September 24, 1984, no award under Section 11 was made within two years. Appeal filed and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1), 5-A, 6, 9, 11, 11-A, 17(4)
  • Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 (Act 68 of 1984): 11-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sets Aside Land Acquisition Declaration for Violation of Section 5-A Hearing Requirement. Failure to Provide Notice of Hearing Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Renders Section 6 Declaration Invalid.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Expunging of Expert Evidence Applying Foreign Law in Suit for Enforcement of Foreign Judgment. Expert Witness Cannot Apply Foreign Law to Facts; Only State the Law Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC and Section 45 Evidence Act.