Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Kerala Land Reforms Act Case; Society Running Orphanage Deemed Person Under Section 2(43). Registered Society Entitled to Seek Shifting of Kudikidappukaran for Orphanage Construction Under Section 75(2)-(3) of Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961.

In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This appeal before the Supreme Court of India concerned the interpretation of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961, in the context of shifting kudikidappukaran (homestead dwellers) from land held by a charitable society running an orphanage. The appellant, Mother Superior of Infant Jesus Fransican Clarist Convent, Enga, represented a society registered under the Society Registration Act and engaged in charitable work through nuns and sisters. The respondents were kudikidappukaran occupying huts on land that the appellant required for constructing a building for an orphanage and residence. The appellant sought to shift the respondents under Section 75 of the Act and had already initiated proceedings before the Special Tahsildar, who measured the site, fixed shifting expenses at Rs.8,000, prepared a draft sale deed, and after approval by the Tribunal, the appellant registered the sale deed in favour of the kudikidappukaran. Despite this compliance, the matter reached the Supreme Court on the question whether the appellant's orphanage was a 'person' within the meaning of Section 2(43) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961, and therefore entitled to invoke Section 75(2)-(3) to require shifting. The Court examined Section 75(1), which grants fixity of tenure to kudikidappukaran, Section 75(2), which allows a person in possession of land to require shifting for bona fide construction of a building for his own residence, and Section 75(3), which applies where the total extent of land held is less than one acre and requires application to the Government for acquisition of alternative land. Section 2(43) defines 'person' inclusively to include a company, etc. The Court held that the society registered under the Society Registration Act, doing charitable work of running an orphanage, squarely fell within the definition of 'person'. Consequently, the appellant was entitled to require shifting of the kudikidappukaran under Section 75(2)-(3) for constructing the orphanage and residence. The Court also noted that the appellant had already complied with the procedure by providing an alternative site and shifting expenses, and had registered a sale deed in favour of the kudikidappukaran. Accordingly, the appeals were allowed. The respondents were given liberty to take the expenses of Rs.8,000 per each of the two huts and construct huts on the alternative site provided by the appellant, and to withdraw Rs.4,000 deposited by the appellant in the Registry of the Supreme Court, with counsel for the respondents at liberty to deduct his fee and give the balance to the respondents.

Headnote

A) Land Reforms - Definition of Person - Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961, Section 2(43) - A society registered under the Societies Registration Act and running a charitable orphanage is a 'person' within the inclusive definition - The court considered whether the appellant's orphanage could invoke provisions for shifting kudikidappukaran - Held that registered society doing charitable work through nuns and sisters falls within the definition of 'person', thereby entitled to seek shifting under Section 75 (Paras 1-2).

B) Land Reforms - Shifting of Kudikidappu Karan - Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961, Sections 75(2) and 75(3) - A person requiring land for constructing a building for his own residence or orphanage may require the kudikidappukaran to shift, and where land held is less than one acre, may apply to Government for acquisition of alternative site - The court held that under sub-sections (2) and (3) read with Section 2(43), the appellant was entitled to possession to construct orphanage and residence, subject to compliance with statutory procedure (Paras 1-2).

C) Land Reforms - Compliance with Procedure for Shifting - Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961, Section 75 - Special Tahsildar measured site, fixed shifting expenses at Rs.8,000, draft sale deed approved by Tribunal and registered in favour of kudikidappukaran; thus appellant complied with provisions - Held that appellant entitled to construct building and respondents at liberty to shift to alternative site and withdraw deposited amount (Para 7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant’s orphanage is a person within the meaning of Section 2(43) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961, and whether the appellant is entitled to require shifting of kudikidappukaran under Section 75(2)-(3) of the Act for constructing an orphanage and residence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. Appellant entitled to construct building for orphanage and residence of nuns and sisters. Respondents at liberty to take Rs.8,000 per each of the two huts to shift to alternative site provided by appellant and construct huts there, and to withdraw Rs.4,000 deposited by appellant in Supreme Court Registry; counsel for respondents at liberty to deduct fee and give balance to respondents.

Law Points

  • Registered society doing charitable work is a 'person' under Section 2(43) of Kerala Land Reforms Act
  • 1961
  • Section 75(2)-(3) enables a landholder to require shifting of kudikidappukaran for bona fide requirement of constructing a building for own residence or orphanage
  • compliance with statutory procedure for providing alternative site and compensation is mandatory.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1995 LawText (SC) (11) 22

1995-11-30

K. Ramaswamy, S.B. Majmudar

1996 SCC (7) 173, JT 1995 (9) 21, 1995 SCALE (7) 250

Mother Superior, Infant Jesus Fransican Clarist Convent, Enga

Ambi Kunjumon & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal before Supreme Court against refusal to permit shifting of kudikidappukaran from land required for construction of orphanage and residence.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought declaration that it is a 'person' under Section 2(43) and entitled to require shifting of kudikidappukaran under Section 75(2)-(3) of Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961.

Filing Reason

Appellant needed land occupied by kudikidappukaran for constructing building for orphanage and residence of nuns and sisters; respondents resisted shifting.

Issues

Whether the appellant’s orphanage is a person within the meaning of Section 2(43) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961 Whether the appellant is entitled to require shifting of kudikidappukaran under Section 75(2)-(3) of the Act for constructing an orphanage and residence

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that as a registered society running an orphanage, it falls within the inclusive definition of 'person' under Section 2(43) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961. Appellant further submitted that it had complied with the statutory procedure: Special Tahsildar measured site, fixed shifting expenses at Rs.8,000, draft sale deed approved by Tribunal and registered in favour of kudikidappukaran, thereby entitling it to possession.

Ratio Decidendi

A society registered under the Societies Registration Act and engaged in charitable work of running an orphanage is a 'person' within the inclusive definition under Section 2(43) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961. Accordingly, such a person can invoke Section 75(2) and Section 75(3) to require shifting of kudikidappukaran for the bona fide requirement of constructing a building for orphanage and residence, provided the statutory procedure for providing alternative site and shifting expenses is complied with.

Judgment Excerpts

The only question is whether the appellant’s Orphanage is a person within the meaning of s.2(43) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961. Therefore, the Society which is registered under the Society Registration Act doing charitable work, namely, orphanage by nuns and sisters is a person within the meaning of s.2(43) of the Act. Under these circumstances, the appellant had clearly complied with the provisions of the Act and entitled to construct the building for orphanage and the residence of nuns and sisters.

Procedural History

The matter arose from proceedings under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961 concerning shifting of kudikidappukaran. Leave granted by Supreme Court. The appellant had initiated process before Special Tahsildar who measured site, fixed shifting expenses at Rs.8,000, draft sale deed prepared and approved by Tribunal and registered in favour of kudikidappukaran. Supreme Court allowed appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961: 2(43), 75(1), 75(2), 75(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Appellants Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. Life Insurance Corporation of India's Termination of Agreement for Sale Upheld as Appella...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalist in Police Defamation Case — Publication of News About Police Disharmony Does Not Attract Section 505(2) IPC. Police Case for Defamation of Public Servant Under Section 500 IPC Not Maintainable Withou...