Supreme Court Examines Challenge to Land Acquisition Under Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 and Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Core Issue Involved Whether Proceedings Initiated Under the State Act Survived Extension of the Central Act and Whether Awards Complying with Section 11-A Were Made.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals challenged the decision of the Rajasthan High Court upholding the acquisition of land under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959. The State of Rajasthan initiated acquisition proceedings for land in various villages around Jaipur for the improvement of Sector 1A, including construction of residential, commercial and industrial units. A notification under Section 52(2) of the Rajasthan Act was issued on 10-10-1979, inviting objections. After considering objections, a notification under Section 52(1) dated 07-03-1984 was published on 20-04-1984, stating that the land vested in the State Government free from encumbrances. The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was extended to Rajasthan on 24-09-1984, after which the Rajasthan Act stood repealed. Suits challenging acquisition were dismissed on 02-09-1986, and awards were passed on 30-09-1988, 30-11-1988 and 28-06-1989. Writ petitions were dismissed by a Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court on 21-10-1992, and appeals were dismissed by Division Benches on 17-12-1992 and 12-05-1994. The main contention of the appellants was that no award had been made within two years of the Section 52 notification, and after extension of the Land Acquisition Act, the Rajasthan Act ceased to operate, requiring compliance with Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act. They also relied on a Rajasthan High Court judgment in Narain v. State of Rajasthan which quashed the notifications. The Supreme Court was presented with the statutory framework: Section 52 of the Rajasthan Act provided for compulsory acquisition; Section 60-A inserted by the 1990 Validation Act provided transitory provisions, deeming notices under Section 52 as notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act and prescribing time limits for declaration or award. The court considered the effect of the extension of the Land Acquisition Act, the invalidity of the 1987 Amendment Act due to lack of President's assent, and the subsequent Validation Act of 1990 which received assent. The judgment excerpt does not include the final holding, but the legal issues and statutory provisions were set out in detail.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Legislative Competence - President's Assent - Rajasthan Urban Improvement (Amendment) Act, 1987; Rajasthan Urban Improvement (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1990 - The 1987 Amendment Act was held ultra vires by Rajasthan High Court as it lacked the President's assent; the 1990 Validation Act received President's assent on 24-03-1995 and inserted Section 60-A to cure defects.

B) Land Acquisition - Repeal and Extension of Central Act - Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 - After extension of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Rajasthan on 24-09-1984, the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 stood repealed, making subsequent acquisition proceedings subject to the Land Acquisition Act.

C) Land Acquisition - Deemed Notification - Section 52 Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959; Sections 4 and 6 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 60-A(3) deemed notice under Section 52(2) as notification under Section 4(1) and notice under Section 52(1) as declaration under Section 6(1), with time for declaration or award from date of commencement of Validation Act.

D) Land Acquisition - Time Limit for Award - Section 11-A Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Section 60-A(3) Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 - Appellants contended awards were not made within two years of Section 52 notification; Section 60-A provided award to be made within two years from commencement of Validation Act.

E) Precedent - High Court Decision Quashing Notifications - Narain v. State of Rajasthan, (1993 [2] Western Law Cases (Rajasthan) 738) - Appellants relied on this judgment quashing notifications dated 10-10-1979 and 07-03-1984; the Supreme Court was asked to consider its effect on the acquisition.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether land acquisition proceedings initiated under Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 survived after extension of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Rajasthan; whether awards made beyond two years were valid; whether notifications under Section 52 could be deemed notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act; validity of Rajasthan Urban Improvement (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1990

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Extension of Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894 to Rajasthan repealed Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act
  • 1959
  • State amendment in 1987 was ultra vires for lack of President's assent
  • Validation Act of 1990 with President's assent inserted Section 60-A providing transitory provisions
  • Notices under Section 52 of Rajasthan Act deemed notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act
  • Awards to be made within one or two years from commencement of Validation Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (02) 154

Civil Appeal Nos. 624-25 of 1993, 626-28 of 1993 and 3851 of 1996 (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 15971 of 1995)

1996-02-27

Kirpal B.N., Verma Jagdish Saran, Singh N.P.

1996 AIR 1296, 1996 SCC (3) 1, JT 1996 (2) 759, 1996 SCALE (2) 543

Mr. A.K. Sen

Pratap and Anr.

The State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to land acquisition proceedings initiated under Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 for acquisition of land in Jaipur for urban improvement.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought quashing of land acquisition notifications and awards, and a declaration that acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Filing Reason

State of Rajasthan issued notifications under Section 52 of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 to acquire land; after extension of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Rajasthan, appellants contended awards were not made within two years and proceedings were invalid.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge of Rajasthan High Court dismissed 24 writ petitions on 21-10-1992, upheld acquisition; Division Bench dismissed appeals on 17-12-1992 and 12-05-1994; separate High Court judgment in Narain v. State of Rajasthan quashed notifications dated 10-10-1979 and 07-03-1984.

Issues

Whether land acquisition proceedings initiated under Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 survived after extension of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Rajasthan on 24-09-1984. Whether awards made after two years of Section 52 notification were valid under Section 11-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Whether notifications under Section 52 of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 could be deemed notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by virtue of Section 60-A. Whether Rajasthan Urban Improvement (Amendment) Act, 1987 was ultra vires for lack of President's assent and whether validation by Rajasthan Urban Improvement (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1990 cured the defect. Whether the Rajasthan High Court judgment in Narain v. State of Rajasthan, which quashed the notifications, affected the acquisition.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants contended that no award had been made within two years of the notification issued under Section 52 of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959. Appellants submitted that with the extension of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Rajasthan, the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 ceased to operate and acquisition proceedings had to comply with the Land Acquisition Act. Appellants argued that awards were made beyond two years without complying with Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, contrary to Section 11-A. Appellants relied on the Rajasthan High Court judgment in Narain v. State of Rajasthan which quashed the notifications dated 10-10-1979 and 07-03-1984, contending that the acquisition could not be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

After the extension of the Land Acquisition Act 1894, to the State of Rajasthan, the existing Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 stood repealed. The provisions of this Amending Act were held to be ultra vires by a decision of the Rajasthan High Court inasmuch as the said Act did not have the assent of the President. Where in a matter pending on the date of commencement, a notice under sub-section (2) of Section 52 or a notice under sub-section (1) thereof has been served or as the case may be published such notice shall be deemed to be the notification or declaration published or made under sub-section (1) of Section 4, or as the case may be, under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act and the declaration or award in such a matter shall be made within a period of one year or, as the case may be, two years from the date of commencement.

Procedural History

Proceedings commenced with notification dated 10-10-1979 under Section 52(2) of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959; notification under Section 52(1) dated 07-03-1984 published 20-04-1984; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 extended to Rajasthan on 24-09-1984; suits challenging acquisition dismissed on 02-09-1986; awards passed on 30-09-1988, 30-11-1988, 28-06-1989; writ petitions dismissed by Single Judge on 21-10-1992; Division Bench dismissed appeals on 17-12-1992 and 12-05-1994; SLP filed and converted to Civil Appeal 3851 of 1996.

Acts & Sections

  • Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959: 52, 53, 60-A
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4, 6, 11-A, 17
  • Rajasthan Urban Improvement (Amendment) Act, 1987: Section 60-A
  • Rajasthan Urban Improvement (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1990: Section 60-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Telecom Dispute Over Quantum Meruit Claim Under Section 70 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 — Contractual Relationship Bars Quantum Meruit Recovery. The Court held that where parties are governed by an express contract, a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Assistant Professors Claiming Professor's Pay Scale Under Career Advancement Scheme — Nominal Designation as Associate Professor Without Substantive Appointment Does Not Entitle to Higher Pay Scale. The ...