Case Note & Summary
The National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG) 2024, conducted by the National Testing Agency (NTA) on May 5, 2024, had approximately 23,33,297 candidates competing for 1.08 lakh medical seats. Allegations of question paper leakage led to petitions for a re-test. The Supreme Court ordered investigations and reviewed data, concluding that the integrity of the examination was not systemically compromised. It was decided not to cancel the exam, and a revised answer key was provided. The Court permitted students with grievances to seek remedies in the jurisdictional High Courts.
1. Examination Overview NEET (UG) 2024 was conducted on May 5, 2024, by NTA. Approximately 23,33,297 candidates appeared for 1.08 lakh medical seats. 2. Allegations of Misconduct Allegations of question paper leakage in Hazaribagh, Jharkhand, and Patna, Bihar. Petitioners sought a re-test citing systemic deficiencies. 3. Court Proceedings and Investigation The Supreme Court ordered disclosures from NTA, Union of India, and CBI. Investigations indicated that 155 students might have benefited from the leak. 4. Expert Analysis and Conclusion The Court considered data and reports, including an IIT Madras analysis. It concluded no systemic breach of the examination's integrity. 5. Decision on the Examination The Court decided against canceling the entire NEET (UG) 2024 examination. A revised answer key was established based on an expert committee's review from IIT Delhi. 6. Options for Affected Students Students with grievances can seek legal remedies in jurisdictional High Courts. 7. Future Directions The Union Government formed a seven-member Expert Committee to ensure the integrity of future exams.Issue of Consideration
Vanshika Yadav Versus Union of India and Others
Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration
Subscribe Now
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NEET (UG) 2024 Integrity Despite Leak Allegations. Ensures Fairness with Revised Answer Key and Permits Legal Remedies for Grievances
2026-05-01 03:14:15
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder and Arms Act Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and FSL Report Discrepancies. Conviction under Section 307/34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Intention and Weapon ...
2026-05-01 03:14:10
