Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order on Re-employment and Back Wages. The court adjusted the back wages from 50% to 30% while ensuring the respondent's reinstatement within a specified timeframe.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the State of Haryana through its Manager, Haryana Roadways against a judgment from the High Court of Punjab & Haryana. The High Court had partly allowed the appeal concerning the re-employment and back wages of the respondent, Krishan Lal, who was terminated on June 30, 1996. The High Court's order modified the original award to entitle the respondent to re-employment from the date another workman was employed after his termination and granted him 50% back wages from the date of the demand notice. During the Supreme Court hearing, the counsel for both parties referred to a previous order from February 6, 2009, where the Supreme Court had similarly modified a High Court order, reducing back wages to 30%. The Supreme Court decided to uphold the principle established in the earlier case, directing the appellants to reinstate the respondent within one month and to pay him 30% of the back wages within three months. The appeal was dismissed with the modification of the High Court's order, and no costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Re-employment - Modification of Back Wages - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court modified the High Court's order regarding back wages from 50% to 30% and directed re-employment of the respondent within one month. The decision was based on a similar case where the Supreme Court had previously ruled on the matter, ensuring the respondent's rights were upheld while adjusting the financial compensation (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent is entitled to re-employment and back wages as per the modified order of the High Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's order, directing the reinstatement of the respondent within one month and awarding him 30% of back wages to be paid within three months. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Re-employment
  • Back wages
  • Modification of award
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (08) 88

Civil Appeal No.5576 of 2009

2009-08-18

Tarun Chatterjee, R.M. Lodha

State of Haryana through Manager Haryana Roadways

Krishan Lal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the High Court's order regarding re-employment and back wages.

Remedy Sought

The State of Haryana sought to challenge the High Court's order on re-employment and back wages.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed to contest the High Court's decision that modified the award in favor of the respondent.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had previously ruled on the respondent's entitlement to re-employment and back wages.

Issues

Entitlement to re-employment Modification of back wages

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued against the High Court's order on back wages. The respondent sought enforcement of the High Court's order for re-employment and back wages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court upheld the principle of modifying back wages based on precedents while ensuring the respondent's re-employment rights were protected.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court had partly allowed the appeal and the award dated 4th of June, 2005 was modified. The appellants, i.e. General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Rohtak shall re-instate the respondent within a period of one month from this date without fail.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the High Court's judgment dated July 31, 2008, which modified the award concerning the respondent's re-employment and back wages.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Execution of Decree for Higher Pay Scales. The decree for higher pay scales was held executable despite being declaratory in nature, as it included a mandatory injunction.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Standards of Weights and Measures Case — Definition of Wholesale Package Clarified. The court upheld the High Court's ruling that the seized packages did not meet the definition of 'wholesale package' under...