Search Results for "re-employment"

45 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Probationer Teacher. Rule 16(2) of MEPS Rules Mandates Notice Before Concluding Voluntary Abandonment of Employment.

The petitioner, Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha, a school management, challenged the judgment and order dated 24.9.2015 of the School Tribunal, Aurangab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Leave Encashment Case for Re-employed Government Servant. Re-employed Employee Entitled to Second Leave Encashment Under Rule 36 of Sikkim Government Services (Leave) Rules, 1982, as Rule 32 Creates Legal Fiction Treating Re-employment as Fresh Service Entry.

The dispute originated from the State of Sikkim's appeal against High Court orders that granted leave encashment benefits to a re-employed government ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Ad Hoc Dental Surgeon Challenging Replacement by Bonded Candidate. MAT's finding that the Original Application became infructuous upon replacement of the ad hoc employee by a bonded candidate was upheld.

The petitioner, Dr. Anil Dhage, a qualified Dental Surgeon, was appointed on an ad hoc basis by the Dean of Medical College, Nagpur on 12.06.1998, fol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retrenched Worker Seeking Absorption as Permanent Employee in University — Land Acquisition for Research Centre Entitles Displaced Person to Preference in Employment Under Section 40 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeth) Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Sumanbai Bhaurao Shinde, a retrenched worker of the respondent Marathwada Agricultural University, filed a writ petition seeking direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of University Teachers on Superannuation Date Interpretation. Statute 16.24 Proviso Entitles Teachers to Continue Till June 30 Following Retirement, Not Just End of Month.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by professors of Kumaun University against the Uttarakhand High Court's judgment that had restricted their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Teachers' Transfer Dilemma: "Petitioners challenge the 2019 Government Resolution, seeking clarity on transfer and absorption rights as urban boundaries expand."

Multiple petitions concerning the transfer or absorption of teachers from Zilla Parishad (ZP) schools into Municipal Corporation (MC) schools when vil...