High Court Quashes Circular Suspending Welfare Activities for Construction Workers During Elections. The court found that the Model Code of Conduct does not justify halting statutory welfare measures under the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 425
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a Circular issued by the Maharashtra Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Board, which suspended various welfare activities under the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 due to the Model Code of Conduct for the upcoming Maharashtra Legislative Assembly Elections. The Petitioners, comprising trade unions and organizations representing construction workers, challenged the Circular, arguing that the suspended activities were statutory imperatives necessary for the welfare of workers and unrelated to electoral activities. The Respondent Board acknowledged that registration and distribution of benefits were essential statutory activities but expressed concerns about potential conflicts with the Model Code of Conduct. The court analyzed the provisions of the Model Code of Conduct and the Act, concluding that the Circular unlawfully suspended statutory rights and benefits that should continue irrespective of the electoral process. The court emphasized that the right to register and avail benefits under the Act is a statutory right that cannot be curtailed during elections. Consequently, the court quashed the Circular, directing the Board to resume registration and distribution of benefits without delay, while ensuring that no new schemes or benefits unrelated to pre-existing provisions were introduced during the election period. The court's decision reinforced the importance of maintaining welfare measures for construction workers as a matter of statutory obligation.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Model Code of Conduct - Suspension of Statutory Activities - Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 - The court held that the Model Code of Conduct does not permit the suspension of ongoing statutory activities related to welfare measures for construction workers, as these are essential for their rights and benefits. The Impugned Circular was quashed for being ultra vires the Act (Paras 15-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suspension of welfare activities for construction workers under the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 due to the Model Code of Conduct is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the Writ Petition, quashed the Impugned Circular, and directed the Board to resume registration and distribution of benefits under the Act without delay, ensuring compliance with past practices during elections.

Law Points

  • Welfare legislation
  • Model Code of Conduct
  • statutory rights
  • registration of beneficiaries
  • electoral conduct
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (11) 61

Writ Petition (L.) No. 33597 of 2024

2024-11-06

Arif S. Doctor, Somasekhar Sundaresan

Ms. Sudha Bharadwaj, Mr. Himanshu Takke, Mr. Akshay Shinde

Maharashtra Rajya Bandhkam Kamgar Sanyukt Kriti Samiti, Satyashodhak Kamgar Sanghatna, Asangathit Kashtkari Kamgar Sanghatna, Kamgar Ekta Union, Kamgar Sanrakshan Samman Sangh, Shivrajya Asangathit Kamgar Sanghatna, Habitat and Livelihood Welfare Association, Niwara Bandhkam Kamgar Sanghatna

State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Building Construction Workers Welfare Board, State Election Commission

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to a Circular suspending welfare activities for construction workers.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the Circular and resume welfare activities.

Filing Reason

The Circular was seen as infringing on statutory rights under the Act.

Issues

Validity of the Circular suspending welfare activities Impact of the Model Code of Conduct on statutory rights

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Circular unlawfully suspended statutory activities essential for workers' welfare. Respondents expressed concerns about potential conflicts with the Model Code of Conduct.

Ratio Decidendi

The Model Code of Conduct does not permit the suspension of ongoing statutory activities related to welfare measures for construction workers, as these are essential for their rights and benefits.

Judgment Excerpts

The Impugned Circular, inasmuch as it seeks to suspend registration of workers as beneficiaries and renewal of such registration, deserves to be quashed and set aside. The right to register in order to avail of benefits under the schemes made under the Act, is a statutory right conferred by Parliament.

Procedural History

The Petition was filed challenging the Circular issued by the Maharashtra Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Board, which suspended welfare activities due to the Model Code of Conduct.

Acts & Sections

  • Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996: Section 12, Section 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Evidence. Allegations of casteist abuse and assault did not meet the threshold for denying bail under Section 18 of the Act.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Police Promotion Dispute; Reversion of Trained Head-Constables Without Enquiry Held Illegal. Adverse Confidential Reports Cannot Justify Denial of Promotion Without Prior Enquiry and Opportunity; Appellants Deemed Prom...