Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Removal of Statue in Road Widening Dispute. Court holds that mandamus cannot compel municipal authority to remove a statue installed on acquired land, as the decision involves policy and budgetary discretion.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Indumati Borse, a 90-year-old resident of Pune, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) to remove a statue of Maharshi Dhondo Keshav Karve installed on a triangular portion of land at Kothrud Karve Road. The land was acquired by the PMC for road widening and other purposes. The petitioner claimed that the statue obstructed road widening and caused traffic congestion. The court examined the prayers and the PMC's affidavit, which stated that the statue was installed as part of a beautification project and that road widening was planned but not yet executed due to budgetary constraints. The court held that a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to compel a public authority to perform a discretionary act in a particular manner. The PMC had the discretion to decide the timing and manner of road widening, and the court could not substitute its judgment. The petition was dismissed, but the court directed the PMC to consider the petitioner's representation and to ensure that road widening is carried out as per its plans.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Public Duty - The court considered whether a writ of mandamus lies to compel a municipal authority to remove a statue for road widening. Held that mandamus is not available to direct a public authority to perform a discretionary act in a particular manner, especially when the decision involves policy and budgetary considerations. (Paras 1-11)

B) Municipal Law - Road Widening - Discretion of Municipal Corporation - The court examined the PMC's decision to install a statue on a triangular plot acquired for road widening. Held that the PMC has the discretion to decide the timing and manner of road widening, and the court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the municipal authority. (Paras 2-10)

C) Property Law - Acquisition - Use of Acquired Land - The petitioner claimed that the statue was installed on land acquired for road widening. The court noted that the land was acquired for 'road widening and other purposes' and that the PMC's decision to install a statue was within its powers. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel the Pune Municipal Corporation to remove a statue of Maharshi Dhondo Keshav Karve from a triangular portion of acquired land for road widening.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. The court directed the PMC to consider the petitioner's representation and to carry out road widening as per its plans.

Law Points

  • Mandamus
  • Public Interest
  • Municipal Discretion
  • Road Widening
  • Statue Installation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 148

WRIT PETITION NO. 8979 OF 2023

2023-10-17

G.S. Patel, Kamal Khata

2023:BHC-AS:31234-DB

Ms Chandana Salgaocar (for petitioner), Mr Abhijit Kulkarni with Gaurav Shahane & Krushna Jaybhay (for respondents 1-5 PMC), Mr AA Alaspurkar, AGP (for respondent State)

Indumati Borse

Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus to compel removal of a statue for road widening.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing PMC to remove a statue of Maharshi Dhondo Keshav Karve from a triangular portion of acquired land to facilitate road widening.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed that the statue obstructed road widening and caused traffic congestion.

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel PMC to remove a statue for road widening. Whether the PMC's decision to install the statue is subject to judicial review.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the statue was installed on land acquired for road widening and that its removal is necessary for public convenience. PMC argued that the statue was part of a beautification project and that road widening is planned but not yet executed due to budgetary constraints.

Ratio Decidendi

A writ of mandamus cannot be issued to compel a public authority to perform a discretionary act in a particular manner. The PMC has the discretion to decide the timing and manner of road widening, and the court cannot substitute its own judgment.

Judgment Excerpts

The controversy in this matter, almost unbelievably, pertains to a statue. It is of Maharshi Dhondo Keshav Karve and it has been installed at Kothrud, Pune on the Kothrud Karve Road. A writ of mandamus is not available to direct a public authority to perform a discretionary act in a particular manner.

Procedural History

The petition was filed on an unspecified date. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith. Respondents waived service. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 17th October 2023.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by accidental fall, not intentional poisoning.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Removal of Statue in Road Widening Dispute. Court holds that mandamus cannot compel municipal authority to remove a statue installed on acquired land, as the decision involves policy and budgetary discretion.