All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Held Appellants Guilty of Contempt for Disobedience of Undertaking Regarding Alienation of Suit Property...

Disobedience of an injunction order remains punishable even if the underlying suit is later dismissed (Samee Khan v. Bindu Khan). A lawyer’s undertaking on behalf of a client binds the clie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquitted the Appellants from Charges of Abetment to Suicide...

Supreme Court of India Set Aside Conviction and Sentence under Sections 306 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 Due to Lack of Direct or Proximate Evidence. Conviction for abetment to suicide requ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Preventive Detention Orders Quashed for Non-Compliance with Constitutional and Statutory Safeguards....

Constitution of India, 1950 (COI) – Article 21 – Protection of Life and Personal Liberty – Violation of Fundamental Rights due to Detention Orders Issued Without Application of Mind ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Denial of Approval for Open Distance Learning and Online Programmes Quashed Due to Violation of Natural Justice...

Violation of Natural Justice – UGC failed to provide an opportunity for hearing, which was mandatory despite its administrative nature. (Para 17, 21) Unreasoned Decision – The impugned communicati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Overturns Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Citing Flaws in Prosecution’s Case and Unreliable Witness Testimony. Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Convincing Evidence and Benefit of Doubt...

Delay in FIR and Suppression of Information:– The court held that the delay in lodging the FIR and suppression of initial information raised serious doubts about the prosecution’s case. The court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The Bombay High Court held that the competent authority could not reject a compounding application solely on the ground of delay, as the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not prescribe a limitation period. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the Chief Commissioner to reconsider the application based on relevant facts and judicial precedents....

Income-tax Act, 1961 – Section 279(2) – Compounding of Offences – CBDT Guidelines – Discretion of Authority The court reaffirmed that when a statute does not prescribe a limitation period, on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court — Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Whether a limited liability partnership (LLP) not being a signatory to the LLP Agreement can still be made a party to arbitration proceedings arising out of the agreement....

a) An LLP, though not a signatory, is inherently connected to the LLP Agreement and its arbitration clause. b) The LLP’s operations and the partners’ mutual rights and duties are governed by the L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Petition Dismissed: No Binding Amendment to Development Agreement Established. Court Holds No Consensus Ad Idem on Essential Terms of Amendment – Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Invoked...

Binding Amendment Requires Consensus on Essential Terms: – For a binding amendment to a development agreement, the parties must reach consensus ad idem on all essential terms, including the plot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Non-Compliance of NDPS Act Procedures Leads to Bail Grant: Bombay High Court Emphasizes Strict Adherence to Statutory Rules. Bail Granted Due to Procedural Lapses in NDPS Act Compliance – Court Directs Strict Implementation of Statutory Rules....

Procedural Lapses in NDPS Act Compliance: The Bombay High Court granted bail to four accused in a narcotics case due to non-compliance with the mandatory procedures under the NDPS Act, particularly th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Regularization of Compassionate Appointments Due to Delay. Failure of the Employer to Inform and Assist in Filing Compassionate Appointment Applications Cannot Be Held Against the Applicants – Orders Quashed...

Employer's failure to fulfill its duty to inform and assist bereaved families in submitting applications within limitation cannot be held against the applicants. Procedural delays caused by the depar...