Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Executing Court’s Dismissal of Obstruction Applications Filed Under Order 21 Rule 97 and 99 CPC. Decree for Eviction Executed; Objectors Failed to Prove Possession at Time of Delivery....

The revision petitions arose from the execution of eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court in three eviction petitions filed by the decree holders (landlords) under Sections 27(1)(a) and (r)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Site Cancellation Due to Misrepresentation and Delay. The court upheld the cancellation of a site allotted under the Economically Weaker Section category as the petitioner's family income exceeded the prescribed limit and the writ petition was filed after seven years....

The petitioner, Smt. A.N. Jayalakshmi, applied to the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) for allotment of a site under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category as per the BDA (Allotment of Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Suit — Limitation Period for Challenge to Auction Sale Under Article 137 of Limitation Act Is Three Years from Date of Sale Confirmation...

The appellant, R Venkatapathy, filed a suit (O.S. No. 8639/2006) before the City Civil Court, Bangalore, challenging the auction sale of property conducted by the Bank of India (respondents 1 and 2) u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Building Constructed After 2001 Exempt from Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. Landlord's Suit for Ejectment Maintainable Under Small Causes Court Act as Section 2(3)(g) Exemption Applies to Premises Constructed After Commencement of the Act....

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the tenant, K.A. Hameed, challenging the order dated 05.09.2013 passed by the II Additional Small Causes Judge and XXVIII ACMM, Bangalore, in S.C.N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Single Judge Order on Maintainability of Private Complaints Against Public Servants Under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Single Judge Had Ruled That the Karnataka Lokayukta Act Does Not Expressly Exclude the Operation of Alternative Measures and There Is No Repugnancy With the Code of Criminal Procedure....

The case originated from private complaints filed by the respondent, Sirajin Basha, against the appellant, B.S. Yeddyurappa, a former Chief Minister of Karnataka. The respondent, along with another pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Anganwadi Worker Appointment Case — Selection Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Reservation Policy. The court upheld the Single Judge's order quashing the appointment of the appellant as Anganwadi Worker due to violation of reservation policy for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes....

The case involves a dispute over the appointment of an Anganwadi Worker at Baraguru Centre-iii in Sira Taluk, Tumkur District. The appellant, Smt. H. Lakshmamma, was appointed by the Deputy Director, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in BSF Pension Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Endorsement Denying Pro-rata Pension. Respondent's Service in BSF and CRPF Held Qualifying for Pro-rata Pension Under Rule 37 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972....

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Union of India and other BSF authorities against an order of a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court. The respondent, B.S. Bopaiah, a retired Subedar of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitral Tribunal Order Imposing Condition on Petitioner to Deposit Amount for Filing Counterclaim. The court held that the Arbitral Tribunal has no power under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to impose such a condition, as Section 23 does not confer any such power....

The petitioner, Ultra Entertainment Solutions Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 26th June 2013 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Arbitral Tribunal Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 115 CPC. Arbitral Tribunal Held Not a Court Subordinate to High Court, Hence Revision Not Maintainable....

The petitioner, The Karnataka Jesuit Educational Society, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore. ...