Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Frame Additional Issues in Suit for Declaration and Possession — Order 14 Rule 5 CPC Requires Issues on All Material Facts Including Adoption and Will...

The petitioner, Sri Armugam, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and recovery of possession in respect of suit property, claiming to be the successor of his sister-in-law Dhanbagyammal. The defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Removal of Adhyaksha of Grama Panchayat; Rule 3(7) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence) Rules, 1994, Prohibits Debate, and Non-Recording of Reasons Does Not Vitiate the Proceedings....

The petitioner, Smt. Gangambike, had been elected as a member of Koppa Grama Panchayat, Piriyapatna Taluk, on 17 May 2010, and subsequently as Adhyaksha on 29 December 2012. On 10 February 2014, fourt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Barred by Limitation. The court held that the Tribunal's finding on limitation is a question of fact not open to revision under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957....

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 (KAIT Act) against orders of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Plaintiff's Writ Petition Challenging Impounding Order in Stamp Act Case — Document Marked Without Objection Cannot Be Reopened. Section 35 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Bars Subsequent Challenge to Admissibility of Insufficiently Stamped Document Once Admitted Without Objection....

The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.28,06,000/-. During trial, the plaintiff produced a deed of agreement dated 24.05.1996, which was marked as Ex.P1 without any objection from the defendant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement Order Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's challenge to a 1986 compulsory retirement order dismissed as the dispute was settled by compromise and the writ petition filed in 2014 was grossly delayed....

The petitioner, S. Rudrappa, a retired cashier of The Mysore Merchants Co-op. Society Ltd., was compulsorily retired on 16.09.1986. He challenged the order by filing a dispute under Section 70 of the ...