Madras High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal of Bank Clerk Convicted of Forgery and Fraud, Upholds Dismissal. Evidence of Witnesses and Documents Sufficient to Prove Misconduct in Domestic Enquiry Without Handwriting Expert....

The appellant, S. Thangavelu, was a Clerk/Shroff at Indian Overseas Bank. On 24.07.2011, he was issued a charge memo for stealthily removing a cheque book, fraudulently making a fictitious entry in th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, P. Prakash, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri, under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SI Recruitment Exam Pattern — No Deviation from Syllabus Found. Tamil Language Questions Were Part of Part-I Eligibility Test, Not Part-II Main Written Examination; No Right to Specific Exam Pattern....

The writ petition was filed by two candidates, B.Gurusamy and S.Anandaraja, challenging the notification dated 04.04.2025 issued by the Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board for direct recru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Encroachment Removal Notice Under Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act — Petitioner Directed to Submit Representation Before Authorities. Show Cause Notice Not a Final Order; Opportunity of Hearing Must Be Afforded Before Removal Under Section 128 of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act....

The petitioner, M. Nagur Meeran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging show cause notices dated 15.02.2025 and 17.02.2025 issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Encroacher Seeking Land Exchange. Encroacher Cannot Claim Exchange of Land as an Absolute Right; Government Land Encroachment Must Be Evicted Following Due Process....

The petitioner, Mariammal, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15.08.2024 passed by the Thasildar (3rd respondent) rejecting her claim for exchange of land. The petitioner was an encroach...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Encroacher Seeking Land Exchange. Encroacher Cannot Claim Exchange of Land as an Absolute Right; Government Land Encroachment Must Be Evicted Following Due Process....

The petitioner, Mariammal, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 15.08.2024 passed by the Thasildar (third respondent) rejecting her claim for exchange of land....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus Against Encroachment on Government Poramboke Tank Land. Civil Suit Against Show Cause Notice Under Section 131 of Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 Held Not Maintainable Due to Statutory Bar Under Section 9 CPC....

The petitioner, Pappathi, filed a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the District Collector, Tahsildar, and Executive Engineer (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Intra-Court Appeal Against Review Order as Not Maintainable — Review Order Cannot Be Challenged When Original Writ Petition Order Has Become Final...

The present intra-court appeal was filed by the Management of Irudhukottai Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. against an order dated 12.03.2025 dismissing their Review Application N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark for Non-Use and Discrepancy in User Date — Ayyappan Brand Registration Expunged. The court held that failure to prove use of the mark as registered and unexplained discrepancy in user date warrant removal under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999....

The petitioner, M/s.Sree Lakshmi Balaji Industries, filed a petition under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking removal/rectification/expungement of the registered trademark ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Application in Service Promotion Dispute — No Error Apparent in Earlier Order. Review jurisdiction cannot be used for re-adjudication of merits; non-consideration of grounds does not constitute error apparent....

The present Review Application was filed by E. Murali and G. Muniratnam (the 2nd applicant was already dismissed as withdrawn) seeking review of an order dated 24.11.2021 passed in W.A.No.844 of 2013....