Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Partition and Adverse Possession. The court held that the appellant failed to prove exclusive title and that the suit was barred by limitation and res judicata....

The case involves a property dispute over Gut No. 152, Old Survey No. 76, admeasuring 5H 36R (13 acres) at Village Pimpri, Taluka Khurd, District Aurangabad. The plaintiffs (respondents herein) are si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Process under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 set aside as complaint lacked specific averments of caste-based insult or intent....

The present appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act) was filed by the appellants, who were original accused Nos. 1 to 7, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Caste-Based Intent. Appellant Tatya @ Arjun Sudhakar Marathe enlarged on bail under Section 14-A of SC/ST Act, 1989, as the alleged caste abuse was not in public view and the incident arose from a personal dispute....

The appellant, Tatya @ Arjun Sudhakar Marathe, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989. Station Master Memo Held Insufficient to Disprove Passenger Status When Valid Ticket Was Recovered....

The appellant, Suman Madhav Dhake, filed an appeal against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, which rejected her application for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989, on the ground...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations and Demand for Customs Duty in Sugar Export Cases. Non-compliance with export obligation due to government-imposed export ban constitutes force majeure, and demand for duty with interest cannot be sustained....

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies engaged in sugar trading and export, challenging the cancellation of advance authorizations and demand for customs duty with interest and p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Employee Against National Insurance Co. for Removal from Service Due to Unauthorized Absence. Medical Grounds and Alleged Procedural Lapses Raised Under National Insurance (CDA) Rules, 2014....

The petitioner, a senior assistant in the National Insurance Company, challenged her removal from service following a departmental inquiry for unauthorized absence since April 2014. She claimed that h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement of CISF Head Constable Under Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The court held that the order was based on a review committee's recommendation and adverse entries, and no procedural irregularity or mala fides were shown....

The petitioner, Mahesh Narayan Shukla, a Head Constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), challenged an order dated 30 October 2019 by the Commandant, CISF, compulsorily retiring him un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Insurance Claim Rejection on Ground of Limitation — Time Bar Clause in Group Health Policy Not Applicable When Claim Submitted Within Policy Period. Clause 7.2 of Group Health Insurance Policy Requiring Claim Submission Within 30 Days of Discharge Held Directory, Not Mandatory, and Cannot Defeat Substantive Right to Claim....

The petitioner, an employee of Export Import Bank of India, held a Group Health Insurance policy from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. for the period 01/04/2021 to 31/03/2022. The policy was on a famil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Filing of Documents at Any Stage. The court held that documents relevant for defence must be allowed to be produced and admitted or denied under Section 294 CrPC, setting aside the trial court's rejection order....

The petitioners, M/s Ascent Ventures and its partners, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 14.11.2025 passed by the learned 11th A...