Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Process under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 set aside as complaint lacked specific averments of caste-based insult or intent.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 156
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act) was filed by the appellants, who were original accused Nos. 1 to 7, 9 and 10 in Criminal M.A. No.179 of 2024 before the Special Court (SC/ST Act), Aurangabad. The respondent No.2, Laxminarayan Chotelal Rathod, filed the complaint as the General Power of Attorney holder of one Fakiri Kisan Gangave, who claimed to be a member of a Scheduled Tribe. The complaint alleged that the accused abused the complainant in filthy language and threatened him in connection with a land dispute. The Special Court issued process against the appellants for offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of the SC/ST Act. The appellants challenged this order before the High Court. The main legal issue was whether the process was sustainable in the absence of specific allegations that the alleged insult or intimidation was on the ground of caste. The appellants argued that the complaint was vague and did not disclose any caste-based animus, while the respondents contended that the allegations were sufficient. The High Court analyzed the provisions of Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) and held that the essential ingredient of these offences is the intent to humiliate or insult a person on the ground of caste. The court found that the complaint merely alleged that the accused abused the complainant in filthy language and threatened him, but did not specify any caste-related words or indicate that the insult was due to the complainant's caste. The dispute was essentially civil in nature regarding land. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, quashed the process issued against the appellants, and set aside the impugned order.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Process Issuance - Section 14-A SC/ST Act - Quashing of Process - The court examined whether the Special Court was justified in issuing process against the appellants under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of the SC/ST Act. The complaint lacked specific allegations that the accused insulted or intended to insult the complainant on the ground of caste. Held that process cannot be issued without prima facie material showing caste-based animus. (Paras 1-10)

B) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(f) - Caste-Based Insult - The provision requires intentional insult or intimidation with intent to humiliate a member of SC/ST. The complaint merely alleged that the accused abused the complainant in filthy language without specifying caste-related words or intent. Held that such general allegations are insufficient to attract the offence. (Paras 5-8)

C) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(g) - Land Dispute - The provision covers offences relating to land transactions. The complaint pertained to a civil land dispute and did not disclose any caste-based element. Held that the dispute was essentially civil in nature and cannot be converted into an atrocity without specific allegations. (Paras 5-8)

D) Power of Attorney - Maintainability of Complaint - The complaint was filed by the General Power of Attorney holder of the alleged victim. The court did not decide on this issue as the appeal was allowed on other grounds. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the process issued against the appellants under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is sustainable in the absence of specific allegations of caste-based insult or intent.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The impugned order dated 16.05.2025 passed by the Special Court (SC/ST Act), Aurangabad in Criminal M.A. No.179 of 2024 is set aside. The process issued against the appellants is quashed.

Law Points

  • Section 14-A of SC/ST Act
  • Section 3(1)(f) of SC/ST Act
  • Section 3(1)(g) of SC/ST Act
  • Power of Attorney holder can file complaint
  • Need for specific allegations of caste-based insult
  • Requirement of intent to humiliate on caste basis
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (04) 121

Criminal Appeal No.872 of 2025

2026-04-20

Y. G. Khobragade, J.

Mr. Shaikh Ashraf Patel, Mr. S. S. Dande, Mr. U. L. Telgaonkar

Nijamoddin Mohamad Khan, Taher Hussain Shaikh, Aleem Saleem Shaikh, Shaikh Shoeb Shaikh Chand, Akhtar Hussain Hasmllah Chaudhary, Shaikh Suleman Abdul Kadar, Shaikh Chand Abdul Kadar, Mohd. Mufid Nathani Mohd Riyaj Nathani

The State of Maharashtra, Laxminarayan Chotelal Rathod

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against order issuing process under SC/ST Act

Remedy Sought

Quashing of process issued against appellants

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged the order of Special Court issuing process for offences under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of SC/ST Act

Previous Decisions

Special Court (SC/ST Act), Aurangabad passed order dated 16.05.2025 in Criminal M.A. No.179 of 2024 issuing process against appellants

Issues

Whether the process issued under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of SC/ST Act is sustainable without specific allegations of caste-based insult or intent?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the complaint lacked specific allegations of caste-based insult and the dispute was civil in nature. Respondents contended that the allegations were sufficient to attract the offences under the SC/ST Act.

Ratio Decidendi

For offences under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of the SC/ST Act, the essential ingredient is that the insult or intimidation must be on the ground of caste. General allegations of abuse without specifying caste-related words or intent are insufficient to issue process.

Judgment Excerpts

The complaint lacked specific allegations that the accused insulted or intended to insult the complainant on the ground of caste. The dispute was essentially civil in nature regarding land and cannot be converted into an atrocity without specific allegations.

Procedural History

Respondent No.2 filed Criminal M.A. No.179 of 2024 before Special Court (SC/ST Act), Aurangabad. The Special Court issued process against the appellants on 16.05.2025. The appellants filed Criminal Appeal No.872 of 2025 under Section 14-A of SC/ST Act before the High Court. The High Court reserved judgment on 06.04.2026 and pronounced on 20.04.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: 3(1)(f), 3(1)(g), 14-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Revoke Leave Under Clause 12 of Letters Patent in Mortgage Suit. Part of Cause of Action Arose Within Jurisdiction as Loan Agreement and Assignment Deed Were Executed in Mumbai and Title Deeds Dep...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Process under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 set aside as complaint lacked specific averments of caste...