Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Civil Suit Where No Allegation of Land Grabbing is Made in Plaint....

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in O.S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Licensed Surveyor's Licence for Violation of Natural Justice. Licence Suspension Set Aside as Petitioner Was Not Given Opportunity of Hearing Before Adverse Order Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964....

The petitioner, Sri Yogananda Murthy A, a Licensed Surveyor, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government....

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in O.S. No.47/2010, allowing I.A. No.6 filed by the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Licensed Surveyor's License for Violation of Natural Justice. License Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964....

The petitioner, Sri Yogananda Murthy A, a Licensed Surveyor, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Interim Maintenance Order in Partition Suit — Inherent Power Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Used to Grant Maintenance Without Specific Provision. Court holds that interim maintenance cannot be granted in a partition suit under Section 151 CPC as there is no specific provision for such relief....

The petitioners, defendants 1 to 4 in a partition suit, challenged an order dated 17.11.2018 passed by the LXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S.No.25238/2015. The respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order....

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited and others, against the Karnataka Electricity Regula...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Prosecution Against Accused in Customs Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction — Petitioner, a Dubai-based Indian, was prosecuted for alleged smuggling of gold bars without prior sanction under Section 137 of the Customs Act, 1962, rendering the complaint invalid....

The petitioner, Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed, was Accused No.2 in CC No.210/2014 pending before the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Judge), Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore. The case arose from a specific intelligen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Recall of Victim for Cross-Examination in POCSO Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Delay. The court held that the accused's right to fair trial includes effective cross-examination, and the trial court's rejection of the recall application was not justified....

The petitioner, Chandrakant @ Kantu, was accused in Special Case (POCSO) No.11/2018 for offences under Sections 366(A) and 376(2)(i)(n) of IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, involving a ...