Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Holding Revision Against Condonation of Delay Lies Only Before State Government Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Order condoning 38-year delay in filing appeal under Section 247 of the Code is not appealable under Section 252, hence revision under Section 257 lies only before State Government....

The petitioners, legal heirs of Ganpati Ishwar Ghatge, challenged an order dated 06.04.2022 passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Pune, which held that a revision application against an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorised Construction in Red Zone — Deemed Sanction Under Section 238(6) of Cantonments Act, 2006 Not Available Where Initial Construction Was Illegal and Application Was Not Validly Pursued....

The petitioner, Lekha Ali Shaikh, owned a plot of land in Dehu Road Cantonment, Pune. In 2009, she constructed a 750 sq.ft structure without obtaining any prior permission from the Cantonment Board. I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Public Interest Over Private Land Use. Court Upholds Public Infrastructure Development over Landowners’ Rights, Ensuring Fair Compensation for Damages....

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition filed by landowners challenging the Goa Tamnar Transmission Project. The court ruled that the project, which involves laying a 400 KV transmission line, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Combine Passing Off with Trademark Infringement Under Clause XIV of Letters Patent. The Court held that the object of Clause XIV is to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, and the defendants' hardship plea was irrelevant to the passing off claim....

The petitioner, Bajaj Electricals Limited, filed a Leave Petition under Clause XIV of the Letters Patent seeking leave to combine a cause of action for passing off with a cause of action for trademark...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of 8-Year-Old Girl Under Section 376-AB IPC and POCSO Act — Delay in FIR Explained by Trauma and Rustic Background of Parents. The court held that the testimony of the child victim was credible and corroborated by medical evidence, and the delay in lodging the FIR was satisfactorily explained....

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Gajanan More for the rape of an 8-year-old girl under Section 376-AB IPC and Sections 4, 6, and 8 of the POCSO Act. The incident occurred on 07.03...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Amended IT Rule 3(1)(b)(v) as Unconstitutional — Majority Opinion Holds Rule Violates Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000....

The batch of writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity of the amendment dated 6th April 2023 to Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Eth...