Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Judgment Debtor’s Liability to Pay Interest Clarified: Deposit in Appellate Court Does Not Cease Accrual of Interest" "Bombay High Court reiterates the conditions for cessation of interest under Order XXI, Rule 1 of CPC."...

This case examines the cessation of interest on a decretal amount deposited by the judgment debtor in an appellate court, rather than the executing court. The petitioner contended that interest should...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Press Release on GST Classification of Hand Sanitisers as Disinfectants — Executive Cannot Pre-empt Quasi-Judicial Adjudication. Press Release dated 15.07.2020 directing classification of alcohol-based hand sanitisers as 'disinfectants' under GST held ultra vires and manifestly arbitrary for encroaching upon quasi-judicial functions....

The petitioner, M/s Schulke India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in trading of hand rubs/sanitisers and antiseptics, which it claims are used as pharmaceutical aid or antibacterial/antisepsis solutions in hosp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows RTI Petition for Disclosure of Marks of All Candidates in Judicial Recruitment — Holds That Marks in Public Selection Process Are Not Exempt Personal Information Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act. Transparency in public recruitment requires disclosure of marks of all candidates to ensure fairness and public confidence....

The petitioner, Shri Onkar Dattatray Kalmankar, applied for the post of Junior Clerk in the District Court at Pune pursuant to an advertisement issued in March 2018. He participated in the recruitment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in MSME Contract Dispute with Railways — Waiver of Section 12(5) Ineligibility Upheld. Petitioner's claim for additional wages dismissed as arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal or against public policy....

The petitioner, M/s. Truly Pest Solution Private Limited, a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME), was awarded a contract by the Central Railway for pest and rodent control in railway coaches for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Return of Plaint in Summary Suit, Holds Dispute Not Commercial Under Commercial Courts Act. Assignment of Debt by Leasing Company Not an Ordinary Transaction of Financier or Trader Under Section 2(1)(c)(i) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015....

The case involves an Interim Application filed by Defendant No. 1 (Varanium Cloud Limited) seeking return of the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) on the ground...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal in Joint Development Dispute — Agreement for Sale Contains Arbitration Clause. MoU and Allotment Letter Held Interlinked with Main Agreement, Not Separate Contracts, Hence Disputes Referable to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The Appellants (BKS Galaxy Realtors LLP and others) filed an Arbitration Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order dated 2nd May 2024 passed by the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes NSE Stop Transfer Order and Directs Issuance of Duplicate Share Certificates — NSE Cannot Invoke Section 108 of Companies Act, 1956 to Freeze Shares of a Non-Defaulting Shareholder....

The petitioner, Aloysius D'Souza, acquired shares of Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. between 1986 and 1997. In 2007, he applied for duplicate share certificates after losing the originals. The transfer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Settlement Regulations and Rejection of Settlement Proposal. Internal Committee's Power to Impose Conditions Precedent Upheld as Valid and Not Ultra Vires....

The petitioners, Abans Enterprises Ltd. and its promoter Abhishek Bansal, challenged the validity of regulations 6(1)(f) and 13(2)(ba) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Settlement Proceed...