Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Examines Writ Petition Against Ward Formation in Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Elections. Petition Challenges Divisional Commissioner's Order Including and Excluding Villages from Electoral Divisions Amid Constitutional Bar on Judicial Interference Under Articles 329, 243-O and 243-ZG....

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, challenging the decision of the Divisional Commissioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Petitions in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Dispute — Petitioners Seek Commencement Certificate and Challenge Stop Work Notice. Petitioners Invoke Regulation 2.8 of DCPR 2034 Deemed NOC Against Non-Issuance of CC and Dispute Inclusion of 66 PAPs in Supplementary Annexure-II Contrary to Supreme Court Order Recording 47 PAPs....

The dispute arose from a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme for redevelopment of a plot bearing F.P. No. 187 (pt.) at Vile Parle, Mumbai. Respondent No.4, a society of slum dwellers, appointed the petitioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Customs Broker in PMLA Proceedings, Directing Provision of Certified Copies of Bills of Entry. Certified Copies of Customs Documents Filed by Broker for 2008-2012 Ordered to be Provided Within 45 Days to Enable Defence Against Money Laundering Charges Under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002....

The petitioner, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, functioned as a customs broker and had filed bills of entries on behalf of several clients between 2008 and 2012. It...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to CIDCO's Cancellation of Hospital Plot Tender. Petition Assails Cancellation Letter Dated 4 October 2024 Alleging Arbitrariness and Non-speaking Order Under Article 226....

The dispute arose from a tender floated by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (CIDCO) for lease of hospital plots in Navi Mumbai. The petitioner, a partnership firm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Workers' Appeals Against Quashing of Reinstatement Award in Industrial Dispute. Labour Court's Award of Reinstatement and Back Wages Was Set Aside by Single Judge; Workers Challenged in Letters Patent Appeals Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947....

The matter arose from retrenchment of five permanent workmen by M/s. Advani Oerlikon Limited, now known as M/s. Ador Welding Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its fact...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Income Tax Appeal on Set Off of Interest Expenditure Under Section 36(1)(iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee Company Challenges Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Order Restoring Assessing Officer's Disallowance of Interest Expenditure Against Interest Income for Assessment Year 1992-93....

By this appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the assessee, a private limited company incorporated on 17 February 1992 under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Landlord-Bank in Rent Control Eviction Matter Due to Unlawful Subletting and Bonafide Requirement. Partnership Deed Treated as Camouflage for Subletting Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, Affirming Concurrent Factual Findings....

These civil revision applications arose from two eviction suits filed by Sangli Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd, a cooperative bank registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Patent Illegality. Denial of opportunity to cross-examine key witness and failure to consider crucial evidence renders award liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The dispute arose out of a contract between Unique Integrated Transport And Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner) and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (respondent) for transportation services....