Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of District Deputy Registrar's Order Refusing to Register Co-operative Society Due to Prior Declaration Under Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970. Matter Pertains to Rights of Flat Purchasers to Form Society Under MOFA, 1963 Despite Promoter's Unilateral Deed of Declaration....

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the order of the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai, dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Caste Claim of Julah (OBC) — Holds That Vigilance Report Supporting Claim Cannot Be Ignored Without Reasons. The Court directed the Committee to reconsider the caste claim afresh with a reasoned order after hearing the petitioner....

The petitioner, Jamadar Mehaboob Ghudubai, challenged an order dated 22/08/2016 passed by the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No.1, Solapur, which invalidated his caste claim as belong...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order for Compassionate Appointment. Rejection of elder brother's application for producing bogus certificate does not bar younger son's independent claim for compassionate appointment under Railway Establishment Code....

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Railway) against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) directing consideration of the respondent's application for compassionate ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Municipal Councillors Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act — Minister's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Speaking Order...

The petitioners, four councillors of the Municipal Council, Narkhed, challenged an order dated 29.11.2016 passed by the Minister of Urban Development, Government of Maharashtra, disqualifying them und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes DV Act Proceedings for Lack of Domestic Relationship — Interim Maintenance Set Aside. Marriage Without Cohabitation in Shared Household Does Not Constitute Domestic Relationship Under Section 2(f) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005....

The petitioners, Dr. Akshay Lakhotiya, his father Navalkishor, and mother Kiran, filed two criminal writ petitions challenging proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Confirms Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Valuation. Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies to suit for possession based on title, and valuation under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 is not a jurisdictional issue....

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and first appellate court in a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Restoration of Essential Services Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Procedural Defect in Filing Section 29 Application Within Rent Suit Cured by Appellate Court's Merits Decision....

The petitioner, Namdeo Maruti Mane, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Ad-hoc District Judge-1, Bhoom in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 19/2016, which allowed the appeal of the respondent, Ish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Impleadment in Land Acquisition Reference Proceedings; Holds Reference Court Lacks Power to Implead Parties Not Before Collector Under Section 30 Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Application by Non-Parties to Collector's Reference Dismissed as Impermissible Enlargement of Dispute....

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings where the Land Acquisition Officer made a reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to the Reference Court for apportionment of ...