Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Return of Seized Vehicle in NDPS Act Case — Petitioner Entitled to Interim Custody of Motorcycle Seized Under Section 43 of NDPS Act, 1985, Subject to Conditions. Vehicle Not Liable to Confiscation Under Section 60 of NDPS Act as Not Used for Commission of Offence....

The petitioner, Mukul Karandikar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court (Bench at Aurangabad) seeking a writ of mandamus directing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Suo Motu Directions to State to Ensure Proper Care for Mentally Deficient Children in Homes. State’s Failure to Implement Juvenile Justice Act Provisions Prompted Mandatory Directions for Streamlined Recognition, Management Committees, and Mental Health Care....

This suo motu Public Interest Litigation was initiated by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on the basis of a newspaper report dated 24 August 2010 in Mumbai Mirror, which exposed the inhuman con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Service Appeal Under MEPS Act, 1977. Petitioner failed to establish direct interest in the termination dispute between employee and school management....

The petitioner, Azaz Kibriya Khan, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18/04/2017 passed by the School Tribunal dismissing his application (Exhibit No.36) seeking to be impleaded as a res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition and Remands Labour Court Award for Lack of Findings on Continuous Service and Abandonment. Award Quashed Due to Absence of Discussion on 240 Days Service and Abandonment, Matter Remitted for Fresh Adjudication....

The petitioner, an employee, challenged the award dated 17.07.2008 passed by the Labour Court in Reference IDA No. 23 of 1998. The High Court found that the award contained absolutely no discussion on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Electricity Department Employee in Death Due to Negligence Case. Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Act by Petitioner Leads to Quashing of FIR and Chargesheet Under Section 304-A IPC....

The petitioner, Krishna Kalangutkar, an Assistant Linesman in the Electricity Department, Bicholim, Goa, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Seed Company Officials in Seeds Act Violation Case. Court holds that vicarious liability cannot be imposed on officers without specific averments of their role in the alleged offence under Section 6(b) read with Section 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966....

The petitioners, M/s Mahyco Vegetable Seeds Ltd. (a seed producer), its Deputy Manager (Legal) M.M. Chavan, and Senior Manager (SDM) Anil Kolte, challenged the order of issue process passed by the Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Subsequent FIR in Land Dispute — Abuse of Process Under Section 482 CrPC. Second FIR on identical allegations as earlier FIR quashed as not maintainable....

The applicant, Mohammad Hisham Osmani, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR No. 321 of 2016 registered at City Chowk Po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988....

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Buldhana, appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Buldhana, acquitting the respondent-accused, Ramlal Shriram Gajbhiye, a Seni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Court Fee Order in Suit for Declaration that Sale Deed is Null and Void. Court held that a plaintiff who is not the executant of a sale deed and does not seek possession is not liable to pay ad valorem court fee on the value of the property under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act....

The petitioner, Niraj Walle, filed a suit for declaration that a sale deed dated 24th December 2010 is null and void and not binding on him. He is not the executant of the sale deed and does not seek ...