Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Return of Seized Vehicle in NDPS Act Case — Petitioner Entitled to Interim Custody of Motorcycle Seized Under Section 43 of NDPS Act, 1985, Subject to Conditions. Vehicle Not Liable to Confiscation Under Section 60 of NDPS Act as Not Used for Commission of Offence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mukul Karandikar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court (Bench at Aurangabad) seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents (State of Maharashtra, Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad, and Police Inspector, Jawaharnagar Police Station) to hand over the motorcycle (vehicle) seized under Section 43 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The petitioner claimed ownership of the vehicle and argued that it was not liable to be confiscated under Section 60 of the NDPS Act as it was not used in the commission of any offence. The respondents opposed the petition, contending that the vehicle was seized in connection with a crime and should remain in police custody pending trial. The court, after hearing both sides, allowed the petition and directed the release of the vehicle to the petitioner on interim custody subject to conditions, including furnishing a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and an undertaking not to transfer or alienate the vehicle. The court held that the vehicle was not liable to be confiscated under Section 60 of the NDPS Act and that the petitioner was entitled to its interim custody.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 43 - Interim Custody of Seized Vehicle - Petitioner sought return of motorcycle seized under Section 43 of NDPS Act - Court held that the vehicle was not liable to be confiscated under Section 60 of NDPS Act as it was not used for commission of offence - Petitioner entitled to interim custody subject to conditions - Held that the vehicle be released on furnishing bond and undertaking not to transfer or alienate the vehicle (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim custody of the motorcycle seized under Section 43 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, pending trial.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to release the vehicle to the petitioner on interim custody subject to conditions: petitioner to furnish a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and an undertaking not to transfer or alienate the vehicle.

Law Points

  • Interim custody of vehicle seized under NDPS Act
  • Section 43 of NDPS Act
  • 1985
  • Return of seized property
  • Conditions for release of vehicle
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (04) 66

Criminal Writ Petition No. 972 of 2016

2017-04-07

S.S. Shinde, K.K. Sonawane

A.K. Bhosale for Petitioner, S.B. Yawalkar (A.P.P.) for Respondents

Mukul Karandikar

State of Maharashtra, Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad, Police Inspector, Jawaharnagar Police Station

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking return of seized vehicle.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to hand over the motorcycle seized under Section 43 of NDPS Act.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's motorcycle was seized by police under Section 43 of NDPS Act, and he claimed entitlement to its interim custody as it was not liable to confiscation under Section 60 of NDPS Act.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim custody of the vehicle seized under Section 43 of NDPS Act, 1985.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the vehicle was not used for commission of offence and not liable to confiscation under Section 60 of NDPS Act, hence entitled to interim custody. Respondents opposed, contending that the vehicle was seized in connection with a crime and should remain in police custody pending trial.

Ratio Decidendi

A vehicle seized under Section 43 of NDPS Act, 1985, which is not liable to confiscation under Section 60 of the Act, can be released on interim custody to the owner pending trial, subject to conditions to ensure its availability.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties. This Criminal Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: 'b. By issuing writ of mandamus or any other writ of like nature or any direction directing the Respondents to hand over the vehicle...'

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 972 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court (Bench at Aurangabad) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking return of his motorcycle seized under Section 43 of NDPS Act. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 4th April 2017, pronouncing it on 7th April 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 43, 60
  • Constitution of India: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Return of Seized Vehicle in NDPS Act Case — Petitioner Entitled to Interim Custody of Motorcycle Seized Under Section 43 of NDPS Act, 1985, Subject to Conditions. Vehicle Not Liable to Confiscation Under S...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Daily Wage Workers Entitled to Regularization After Completing 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.