Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Non-Compliance of DRP Directions Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 144C(13) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Complete Assessment Within One Month of Receiving DRP Directions Renders Transfer Pricing Addition Time-Barred and Non-Est....

The Petitioner, Archroma International (India) Private Limited (formerly Huntsman International (India) Private Limited), filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator....

The applicant, Mangal Credit and Fincorp Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Terminating Employee with Speech and Language Disability. Court Examines Compliance with Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 in Employment Termination....

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay, challenging the termination of the petitioner, a permanent employee of the Maharashtra State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to CAT Order Directing Reconsideration of Induction into Indian Forest Service. Delay in Cadre Review Does Not Extinguish Right of State Forest Officer to Be Considered for Induction Under Regulation 5(3) of IFS (Cadre) Regulations, 1966....

The State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 9 October 2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench, in Original Application No. 777 of 2011 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Electricity Theft Case Against Owner — Mere Ownership Not Sufficient for Section 135 Liability. The court held that without specific evidence of direct involvement in tampering, the owner cannot be prosecuted under the Electricity Act, 2003....

The applicant, Navin Prakashsingh Thakur, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.401/2020 registered at Police Station Akot F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Licence Revocation and Adverse Possession. Court holds that licence granted for construction is revocable under Section 62 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, and that mere long possession does not establish adverse possession without proof of hostile animus....

The present second appeal arises from a property dispute between two brothers, Madhukar Bholaram Hatwalne (original defendant) and Yeshwant Bholaram Hatwalne (original plaintiff), both deceased, repre...