High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Single Income Tax Return Sufficient for Income Assessment. Tribunal's award of Rs.20,68,720/- to parents of deceased bachelor upheld with 50% future prospects, 2/3rd deduction, and multiplier of 18....

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Rajkumar, died in a vehicular accident on 16 October 2010 while riding pillion on a motorcycle. The tanker driver, insured by the appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene....

The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London in 2023. The artworks depicted nudes, including so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Pillion Rider in Motor Vehicle Accident - Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Court applies multiplier method and adds future prospects to compute loss of dependency under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 12.12.2014 passed by the 12th Additional Small Causes Judge, Member, MACT, Bengaluru in MVC No.6528/2011. The claimant, G. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Miscellaneous Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Appellate Court's Reversal of Ex-Parte Decree. Restoration of Suit Ordered as Defendants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC....

The present Miscellaneous Second Appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the defendants in the original suit, challenging the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2024 passed by the VI Additional Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Refund Rejection Orders for Violation of Natural Justice in CGST Refund Proceedings. Personal Hearing Must Be After Reply Filed Under Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017....

The petitioner, Credit Agricole CIB Services Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging refund rejection orders uploaded on the department's website on 25 April 2024. The petitioner had applie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Construction — Finds Appellate Court's Reversal Not Perverse. Landlord Failed to Plead Original Condition of Premises Under Section 13(1)(b) of Bombay Rent Act....

The petitioner, Hemant Bharat Kachare, as landlord, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and decree dated 16 February 1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Pune, which allowed Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Revision, Reduces Sentence in Unlawful Assembly and Grievous Hurt Case. Constructive Liability Under Section 149 IPC Upheld for Accused Who Joined Armed Assembly Without Active Participation....

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by five accused challenging their conviction and sentence by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shrigonda, in Regular Criminal Case No.237 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Challenge" "Justice Arif S. Doctor condones a 14-day delay in filing under Section 34, interpreting procedural requirements for signed arbitral awards in light of mandatory statute compliance."...

1. Introduction and Parties The case involves the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) as the petitioner and Mumbai Metro One Pvt Ltd (MMOPL) as the respondent in a commercial arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Act Case Due to Inordinate and Unexplained Delay of 15 Years. Transfer to Call Book Without Intimation Violates Section 28(9) of Customs Act, 1962....

The petitioner, Paresh H. Mehta, a sole proprietor of M/s. P. H. Mehta and Co., challenged a show cause notice dated 16 May 2008 issued under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, alleging clandest...