Madras High Court Quashes FIR Following Amicable Settlement Between Parties. The Court Allowed the Petition to Quash the First Information Report Under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 506(i) and 379 IPC, Considering the Compromise Between the Parties.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present Criminal Original Petition was filed by the petitioners-accused under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.715 of 2023 registered against them by the first respondent police for offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 506(i) and 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The FIR was dated 24.12.2023. The second respondent was the defacto-complainant. During the pendency of the petition, the parties entered into an amicable settlement and executed a compromise memo dated 15.03.2024, which was filed before the court. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that the matter had been settled and the defacto-complainant and all the accused were present before the court. Upon enquiry by the court, the defacto-complainant confirmed the terms of the compromise and expressed no objection to the quashing of the FIR. The court perused the terms of the compromise memo. The legal issue was whether the FIR could be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties. The court, considering the nature of the offences and the fact that the parties had voluntarily settled their dispute, found it appropriate to allow the petition. Recording the compromise memo, the court quashed the FIR and directed that the compromise memo shall form part of the order. The decision primarily favoured the accused as the FIR was quashed. The judgment underscores the principle that where parties have amicably resolved their disputes and the complainant is willing to compound the matter, the High Court in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS can quash criminal proceedings to secure the ends of justice, even if the offences are not compoundable under the Code, provided the nature of the offences does not involve serious public policy concerns.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Compromise Between Parties - Section 528, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - The petitioners sought quashing of FIR registered under various sections of IPC. During pendency, an amicable settlement was reached and a compromise memo filed. The court, after perusing the terms and considering the nature of offences, allowed the petition and quashed the FIR. Held that it is appropriate to quash the FIR when parties have compromised and the defacto-complainant has no objection. (Paras 2-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR in Crime No.715 of 2023 can be quashed in view of the compromise between the parties?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The FIR in Crime No.715 of 2023 dated 24.12.2023 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed. The compromise memo dated 15.03.2024 shall form part of the order.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR based on amicable settlement
  • exercise of powers under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • 2023
  • compromise of non-compoundable offences in the interest of justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 203

CRL. O.P(MD) No.6035 of 2024

2025-03-04

P. DHANABAL, J.

Mr.P.Sujai Krishna for petitioners, Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi for R1, Ms.Arunithy for R2

Nambiessakki @ Kannan, Manikandan

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Tirunelveli City; Saravanan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Original Petition for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.715 of 2023

Filing Reason

To quash the FIR registered against them for offences under IPC

Issues

Whether the FIR in Crime No.715 of 2023 can be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties?

Submissions/Arguments

The learned counsel on both sides represented that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and a compromise memo was filed. The defacto-complainant and all the accused were present and the defacto-complainant has no objection to quash the FIR.

Ratio Decidendi

Where parties have amicably settled their dispute and entered into a compromise, and considering the nature of the offences, it is appropriate to quash the FIR in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the nature of the offences and the fact that the parties have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and the First Information Report in Crime No.715 of 2023 dated 24.12.2023 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed this Criminal Original Petition under Section 528 of BNSS seeking quashing of FIR. During pendency, parties entered into compromise and filed compromise memo before the Court. The matter was taken up for hearing and the court enquired the defacto-complainant and all accused present. The defacto-complainant had no objection to quashing.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 341, 294(b), 323, 506(i), 379
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Quashes FIR Following Amicable Settlement Between Parties. The Court Allowed the Petition to Quash the First Information Report Under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 506(i) and 379 IPC, Considering the Compromise Between the Parties.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Corporator Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Failure to Produce Valid Caste Certificate Leads to Disqualification Under Section 16(1A).