Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition for Demolition Against Private Respondent; Directs Authorities to Follow Due Process. Court Issues Directions Under Article 226 of Constitution, Requiring Demolition of Unauthorized Construction as Per Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019 if Found Violating Law.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a resident of Seashore Town, Panaiyur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, the Commissioner of Greater Chennai Corporation, and the Assistant Commissioner of Zone 15 (respondents 1 to 3) to take action against the fourth respondent and demolish the unauthorized construction being carried out by him at Plot No.86, 3rd Avenue, Seashore Town, Panaiyur, Sholinganallur, Chennai. The construction was alleged to be in violation of the Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019 and CMDA Regulations. The matter came up before a Division Bench of the High Court. The standing counsel for the Corporation informed the court that the authorities had conducted a field inspection on 13.02.2025 and subsequently issued a Stop Work Notice to the fourth respondent. The court noted that since a notice had already been issued, the fourth respondent's right to defend his case was protected. The court directed the second and third respondents to continue all further actions by following due process as contemplated under the relevant Act and Rules. It further directed that if any unauthorized constructions were identified, they be demolished after following the prescribed procedures. The entire exercise was to be completed within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Unauthorized Construction - Demolition - Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019 and CMDA Regulations - The court directed authorities to continue all further actions following due process, including demolition if unauthorized construction is identified, within three months; Held that the right of the fourth respondent to defend is protected after issuance of Stop Work Notice (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing demolition of unauthorized construction allegedly violating Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019 and CMDA Regulations.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of. The second and third respondents are directed to continue all further actions by following due process as contemplated under the Act and Rules. If any unauthorised constructions are identified, it is to be demolished by following the procedures. The entire exercise is directed to be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Law Points

  • Due process in building regulation enforcement
  • Protection of right to defend
  • Mandamus for demolition of unauthorized construction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 149

WP No. 4209 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.4696 of 2025

2025-03-04

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar

S. Panner Selvam, R. Sivakumar, G. T. Subramanian

Divya Murphy Thomas

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Assistant Commissioner Zone 15 Greater Chennai Corporation, Harirajan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus for demolition of unauthorized construction.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondents 1 to 3 to take action against 4th respondent and demolish unauthorized construction.

Filing Reason

Alleged unauthorized construction by 4th respondent in violation of the Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019 and CMDA Regulations.

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing demolition of unauthorized construction when a stop work notice has already been issued by authorities.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for direction to demolish unauthorized construction. Respondents 1-3 informed court that a stop work notice was issued on 13.02.2025 after field inspection. Fourth respondent not ready in notice.

Ratio Decidendi

When authorities have already issued a stop work notice regarding alleged unauthorized construction, the right of the alleged violator to defend is protected, and the court may direct authorities to continue due process including demolition if warranted, rather than issuing a direct demolition order.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Corporation on instructions would submit that the Authorities have conducted field inspection on 13.02.2025 and consequently, Stop Work Notice has been issued to the fourth respondent. Thus, the second and third respondents are directed to continue all further actions by following due process as contemplated under the Act and Rules. If any unauthorised constructions are identified, it is to be demolished by following the procedures. The entire exercise is directed to be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed directly in High Court; no prior proceedings mentioned.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019:
  • CMDA Regulations:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice — First Appellate Court Decided Ex Parte Without Hearing Defendants. Reversal of Suit Dismissal Set Aside as Appellate Court Failed to Ensure Service or ...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition for Demolition Against Private Respondent; Directs Authorities to Follow Due Process. Court Issues Directions Under Article 226 of Constitution, Requiring Demolition of Unauthorized Construction as Per Tami...