High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Employer to Pay Suspension Period Salary with 6% Interest. Suspension Period Treated as Duty When Revoked Without Departmental Enquiry, Making Appointing Authority Liable Under Rule 24(5) of Standard Code Rules, 1984....

The dispute concerned non-payment of salary for the suspension period of a Lab Attendant employed by an aided Ayurved Mahavidyalaya. The petitioner had been working as a Lab Attendant with respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Railway Claims Tribunal Order Denying Compensation in Railway Accident Claim. Accidental Fall from Running Train Held Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c) and Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989; Hearsay Evidence Cannot Establish Passenger Negligence....

The matter arose from a railway accident claim filed by the mother and married daughter of the deceased Vijaysingh Jeevansingh Thakur before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rejection of Plaint in Wakf Suit as Vexatious and Abuse of Process. Order VII Rule 11 CPC empowers court to reject plaint when meaningful reading shows no clear right to sue and prior decrees on same cause bar relief....

The dispute arose from a civil revision application challenging an order of the Maharashtra Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad, which rejected a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Habeas Corpus Petition as Withdrawn. Withdrawal request by counsel for the detenue's husband led to dismissal of the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without adjudication on merits....

The matter before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court was a Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Arthi Shyam, described as the husband of the detenue, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery of Money Suit — Limitation Period for Refund of Advance Under Agreement to Sell Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, Not Article 24. Agreement to Sell Not a Bond, Hence Article 24 Inapplicable; Suit Filed Within Three Years from Date of Refusal to Execute Sale Deed Is Within Limitation....

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for recovery of money seeking refund of an advance amount of Rs. 5,00,000 paid to the respondent-defendant under an agreement to sell dated 17.02.2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, Limitation Barred Suit. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and payment of earnest money; suit filed beyond three years from date of refusal....

The present Regular First Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 03.08.2022 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad, in O.S. No.511/2014. The appellant, originally defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seniority List in Junior Assistant Cadre Due to Incorrect Placement of Hyderabad-Karnataka Region Appointees. Seniority Must Be Based on Date of Appointment, Not Reservation Status....

The petitioner, Kallappa Gonnagar, a Junior Assistant in the O&M Division of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), challenged the seniority list dated 02.08.2023 published by the 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Robbery and Extortion Case Due to Parity and Lack of Criminal Antecedents. Petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 4 were granted bail under Section 483 BNSS / Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 310(2), 311, 238, 312 of BNS 2023, as co-accused were already enlarged on bail....

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard two criminal petitions filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrP...