High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Admiralty Suit for Vessel Arrest and Collision Damages Involving Two Vessels at Marmugao Port. The Court was seized of a claim for damages of Rs.13,33,70,000 arising from alleged negligent collision and a counter claim seeking limitation of liability under Merchant's Shipping Act, 1958....

The matter was an admiralty suit filed in the Bombay High Court's Admiralty and Vice Admiralty jurisdiction by V.M. Salgaocar and Bro. Ltd., owner of motor vessel M.V. Sanjeevani, against M.V. Priyamv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Holds Revenue Minister's Order Unsustainable for Lack of Reasons in Mutation Entry Dispute. Non-Speaking Order Violates Natural Justice as Court Finds No Consideration of Rival Contentions or Delay....

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order dated 27/08/2014 passed by the Minister (Revenue), Maharashtra State in Appeal No.2014/P.K.131/J-6. The Minister al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Motorcyclist in Motor Accident Claim — Claimant Awarded Additional ₹1,00,000 with 6% Interest. The court held that the Tribunal's award of ₹1,00,000 was inadequate and enhanced it by ₹1,00,000 under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, considering the nature of injuries and loss of income....

The appellant, Shivegowda, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 05.09.2017 passed by the Motor Accident Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent, the Assistant Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show-Cause Notice Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — DGGI Officer Not Authorized as Proper Officer. The court held that only officers specifically authorized by the Commissioner can issue notices under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the DGGI officer lacked such authorization....

The petitioner, M/s NCS Pearson Inc., a Minnesota-based corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3A CPC. Appellant's Application for Temporary Injunction Restoring Possession of Suit Property Remanded for Fresh Consideration with Mandatory Compliance of Order 39 Rule 3A CPC....

The appellant, Smt. Yashodamma, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(s) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), challenging the order dated 31.08.2024 passed by the VI Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Title Over BDA Acquired Land — Petitioner Fails to Establish Possession or Title After 1971 Acquisition Notification Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945....

The petitioner, Sri Venu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the respondents have no right whatsoever over the petition schedule p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Trial Court Order Refusing Consent Decree in Partition Suit Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. Consent Terms Covering Properties Beyond Suit Property Are Lawful and Do Not Require Proof of Title; Trial Court Directed to Pass Decree Within One Month....

The High Court of Bombay at Goa considered a writ petition challenging an order of the Civil Judge Senior Division at Panaji in Special Civil Suit No.9/2023/A. The underlying suit concerned partition ...