High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Mandatory 20% Deposit Condition Under Section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act in Cheque Bounce Appeals. Interpretation of 'May' and 'Shall' in Section 148(1) and Requirement of Reasons for Exceptional Waiver Examined in Light of Supreme Court Precedents....

The matter involved cross criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from four cheque dishonour complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicated Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Final Verdict Not Stated in Provided Excerpt. Petition Raised Issues of Necessary Parties and Interpretation of Payment Obligations Under Supply Agreement and Multi-Party Agreement Clauses 5.4.2, C, and D....

The judgment dealt with a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division. The P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Relief in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Dispute Involves Investment and Assignment of Rights Agreement for Movie 'Charak' and Alleged Breach of Escrow Account and Assignment Obligations....

The dispute concerned an Investment and Assignment of Rights Agreement dated April 24, 2025 between M/s Global Impex (petitioner) and M/s Sipping Tea Cinemas LLP (respondent) for financing a movie ten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Petitions Arise from Proceedings Under the Act. No Specific Legal Principle Stated in Provided Excerpt; Court Reserved Judgment on 9 July 2025 and Pronounced on 4 August 2025....

This judgment, delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, pertains to a batch of writ petitions arising out of proceedings under the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906. The co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favor of Plaintiff. Agreement to Sell and Part Payment Established, Injunction to Prevent Alienation Upheld Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC....

The present appeal arises from an order dated 12.02.2025 passed by the Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, allowing I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 Not Lapsed Despite Non-Completion of Scheme. Possession Taken and Award Passed, No Abandonment or Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976....

The appellant, Sri M. Rajappa, filed a writ appeal before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging an order dated 16.12.2024 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.6371/2021. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunction Order Against Digital Media Journalist in Defamation Suit Concerning Dharmasthala Temple Allegations. The High Court found the order granting mandatory injunction without hearing the petitioner and without reasons was illegal and unconstitutional prior restraint....

The writ petition was filed by a digital media journalist (defendant No. 66 in the underlying defamation suit) challenging an ex-parte ad-interim injunction order dated 18-07-2025 passed by the X Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim for 2% Contract Value Without Work Execution. Claim for facilitation fee under MOU fails as appellant did not perform any work for the contract awarded to the joint venture....

The appellant, M/s. Pratibha Industries Limited, filed a commercial appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Transfer Application in Matrimonial Dispute Citing Delay Tactics and Contradictory Allegations. Transfer Petition Rejected as Matter at Advanced Stage Before Family Court; Court Allows Video Conferencing Facility and Directs Early Disposal Within Three Months....

The matter arose from a Miscellaneous Civil Application filed by the applicant-wife seeking transfer of a divorce case pending before the Family Court at Pune to the Civil Court, Senior Division, Kala...