High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Revision Against Summoning Order in Cheque Dishonour Case — Dispute Over Partnership Firm's Authority to File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that a complaint under Section 138 must be filed by an authorized person, and partners are not automatically liable....

The applicants, Romell Housing LLP and Jude Romell, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging the summoning order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 37th Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Territorial Jurisdiction in Section 11 Arbitration Application Over Insurance Claim Dispute. Court Finds Entire Cause of Action Arose in Telangana and Head Office Presence in Mumbai Alone Did Not Confer Jurisdiction Under Clause XII of Letters Patent....

Two applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were filed before the Bombay High Court seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator to resolve insurance policy disputes. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Interim Application in Partnership Dispute — Appointment of Arbitrator and Interim Relief Granted. Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 to Protect Subject Matter of Dispute....

The case involves a dispute between M/s Sky One Corporate Park LLP and others (petitioners) and Shobha Rasiklal Dhariwal and another (respondents) arising out of a partnership deed. The petitioners fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Section 34 Petitions Challenging Conflicting Stock Exchange Arbitral Awards. Court Focuses on Whether Same Arbitrator's Contradictory Findings on Identical Facts Vitiated Awards Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

Three petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging arbitral awards arising from stock exchange ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Applicant in Cheating and Forgery Case — Investigation Complete, No Custodial Interrogation Required. Pre-arrest bail allowed under Section 438 CrPC for offences under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 BNS as investigation complete and applicant cooperated....

The applicant, Haribhau Dnyandev Chemte, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.152 of 2025 registered at Vi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Properties by Investigating Officer in Bank Fraud Case — Lack of Statutory Authority Under M.P.I.D. Act. Investigating Officer Cannot Freeze Immovable Properties Without Legal Provision; Bail Conditions Already Complied With....

The petitioner, Vijaykumar alias Vijay S/o Sitaram Dandanaik, was the chairman of Vasantdada Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd, Osmanabad. He was arrested in connection with Crime No. 279/2023 registered with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Voter Delegation in Co-operative Bank Election Due to Non-Application of Mind. The court quashed the impugned endorsement and directed reconsideration of the petitioner's name in the provisional voters list under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959....

The petitioner, Timmayya Gangadhar Hegde, a chartered accountant and agriculturist, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Invitation to Banu Mushtaq as Chief Guest for Dasara Festival Inauguration at Chamundi Temple. Court holds that the invitation does not violate any law or constitutional provision and that the government's decision is a policy matter not subject to judicial review....

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petitioners, Sri H.S. Gaurav and Prathap Simha, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Notice Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Police Act Not Served. Failure to Serve Notice Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Renders Externment Proceedings Void Ab Initio....

The petitioner, Bharat Shatrughana Bhosale, challenged an externment order passed under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, which externed him from two districts for six months. T...