High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Motorcyclist in Motor Accident Claim — Claimant Awarded Additional ₹1,00,000 with 6% Interest. The court held that the Tribunal's award of ₹1,00,000 was inadequate and enhanced it by ₹1,00,000 under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, considering the nature of injuries and loss of income....

The appellant, Shivegowda, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 05.09.2017 passed by the Motor Accident Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent, the Assistant Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show-Cause Notice Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — DGGI Officer Not Authorized as Proper Officer. The court held that only officers specifically authorized by the Commissioner can issue notices under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the DGGI officer lacked such authorization....

The petitioner, M/s NCS Pearson Inc., a Minnesota-based corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3A CPC. Appellant's Application for Temporary Injunction Restoring Possession of Suit Property Remanded for Fresh Consideration with Mandatory Compliance of Order 39 Rule 3A CPC....

The appellant, Smt. Yashodamma, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(s) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), challenging the order dated 31.08.2024 passed by the VI Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Title Over BDA Acquired Land — Petitioner Fails to Establish Possession or Title After 1971 Acquisition Notification Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945....

The petitioner, Sri Venu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the respondents have no right whatsoever over the petition schedule p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Trial Court Order Refusing Consent Decree in Partition Suit Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. Consent Terms Covering Properties Beyond Suit Property Are Lawful and Do Not Require Proof of Title; Trial Court Directed to Pass Decree Within One Month....

The High Court of Bombay at Goa considered a writ petition challenging an order of the Civil Judge Senior Division at Panaji in Special Civil Suit No.9/2023/A. The underlying suit concerned partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard Writ Petition on Applicability of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and Adoption Regulations, 2022 to Adoption of US Citizen Child by Indian Relatives. Court Examined CARA's Refusal to Register Indian Prospective Adoptive Parents on CARINGS Portal for Adoption of American Citizen Child Under Section 56 of JJ Act....

By this writ petition, the petitioners, an Indian married couple, brought to the attention of the Bombay High Court an unprecedented situation concerning the applicability of the Juvenile Justice (Car...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Employee in Disability Discrimination Case Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Voluntary Retirement Acceptance Without Informing Employee of Section 47 Rights Amounts to Wrongful Termination....

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by the Union of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 23/01/2009. The respondent, Hanumant Ye...