High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals Against Disqualification of Municipal Councillors Under Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964. Upholds Single Judge Order Confirming Disqualification for Defection Under Section 16(1A) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964....

The judgment arises from two writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 09/04/2025 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 107601/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Issues Common Order in Writ Petitions Challenging Show Cause Notices Under Karnataka Tank Conservation and Development Authority Act, 2014. The court considered whether parallel proceedings under the 2014 Act could continue when a Special Court under the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 had already taken cognizance....

The writ petitions arose from show cause notices dated 29.11.2024 issued by the Prescribed Officer under the Karnataka Tank Conservation and Development Authority Act, 2014 to several property owners....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Motor Accident Claim Appeal; Quashes Tribunal's Dismissal and Awards Enhanced Compensation. Saree Entanglement in Motorcycle Wheel Constitutes 'Accident' Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Making Insurer Liable Despite Four Riders on Bike....

The first appeal arose from dismissal of a claim petition by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kolhapur. The appellants, minor children and mother-in-law of the deceased, sought compensation from th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal of Interim Relief in Land Development Dispute. Dispute Involved Conditions Precedent in Memorandum of Understanding and Effect of Revival of Show Cause Notice on Title to Leased Land....

The judgment text provided contains the factual background and context of a commercial arbitration petition filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an Arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Allegations of Arbitrator Bias in Stamp Duty Compliance Matter. Arbitrator's Visit to Stamp Authorities to Explain Legal Process Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Deemed Part of Statutory Duty and Not Evidence of Partiality....

The petition invoked Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking substitution of the sole arbitrator on the ground that she lacked independence and impartiality. The dispute a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute — Appellants Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. The trial court's order granting temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was upheld as the respondents demonstrated possession and the appellants' remedy lay in filing a counterclaim....

The appellants, Smt. A.Y. Sathyavathi, Sri. Sagar Gowda, and Smt. Anushka, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment in Writ Petitions No.638, 646 and 647 of 2023. The court pronounced its decision on 22 July 2025 after reserving the matters on 8 July 2025; the substantive merits of the writ petitions are not discernible from the available extract....

The available extract of the judgment contains only the caption pages, appearances of advocates, certain citations, and a table of promotions. The substantive text containing the facts, legal issues, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Appellate Decree Declaring Deemed Tenancy Under Section 15A of Bombay Rent Act. The Dispute Centres on Whether a Conducting Agreement Dated 29 January 1972 Was a Camouflage for a Leave and Licence and Thus Protected Under Section 15A from 1 February 1973....

The litigation arose from a dispute over a ground floor shop premises in Jamshed Building, Jacob Circle, Mumbai. The original defendant was the lessee of four shop premises and allegedly allotted one ...