Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage and Long Separation Considered Cruelty. False Criminal Complaints and Over 13 Years of Separation Justify Grant of Divorce with Permanent Alimony of Rs. 25 Lakhs.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 170
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant-husband, Yogendra Lahu Bhoir, and the respondent-wife, Prema Yogendra Bhoir, were married on 10 May 2006 and had a son born on 18 June 2007. Marital discord began in 2008, and the wife left the matrimonial home on 2 September 2012, after which the parties lived separately. The husband filed a divorce petition on 24 June 2013 before the Family Court, Thane, under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging cruelty. The wife filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights on 24 March 2014 and a criminal maintenance application on 26 March 2015. The Family Court dismissed the divorce petition on 15 May 2019, holding that the husband failed to prove cruelty. The husband appealed. The High Court noted that the parties had been living separately for over 13 years, with multiple litigations and no possibility of reconciliation. The court considered the wife's conduct, including filing false criminal complaints, and held that the irretrievable breakdown of marriage constituted cruelty. The court allowed the appeal, granted divorce, and directed the husband to pay permanent alimony of Rs. 25,00,000 to the wife within six months, failing which the divorce decree would not take effect. The court also disposed of the wife's interim application for maintenance.

Headnote

A) Hindu Marriage Act - Divorce on Ground of Cruelty - Section 13(1)(i-a) - Irretrievable Breakdown - The appellant-husband sought divorce alleging cruelty by the wife, including false criminal complaints and long separation. The Family Court dismissed the petition. The High Court held that the conduct of the wife in filing multiple false complaints and the irretrievable breakdown of marriage due to over 13 years of separation constituted cruelty, and granted divorce. (Paras 1-17)

B) Hindu Marriage Act - Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage - Section 13(1)(i-a) - Long Separation - The parties lived separately since 2012, with no possibility of reconciliation. The High Court held that such long separation and the failure of marriage are relevant factors in determining cruelty, and granted divorce to prevent further hardship. (Paras 10-17)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant-husband is entitled to divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and whether the irretrievable breakdown of marriage can be a basis for granting divorce.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Marriage dissolved by decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Appellant to pay permanent alimony of Rs. 25,00,000 to respondent within six months, failing which decree not to take effect. Interim application disposed of.

Law Points

  • Cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Irretrievable breakdown of marriage
  • Long separation as cruelty
  • Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC
  • Restitution of conjugal rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (11) 358

Family Court Appeal No.137 of 2019

2025-11-14

Shree Chandrashekhar, CJ, Gautam A. Ankhad, J.

2025:BHC-AS:49554-DB

Ms. Divya A. Pawar with Mr. Krishnakant Deshmukh for appellant, Ms. Lucy Massey with Ms. Aarti R. Dharamsey for respondent

Yogendra Lahu Bhoir

Mrs. Prema Yogendra Bhoir

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of divorce petition by Family Court

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought divorce on ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Filing Reason

Alleged cruelty by wife including false criminal complaints and long separation

Previous Decisions

Family Court dismissed divorce petition on 15 May 2019

Issues

Whether the appellant proved cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Whether irretrievable breakdown of marriage can be a ground for divorce?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that wife filed false criminal complaints and caused mental cruelty, and marriage has irretrievably broken down due to long separation. Respondent argued that she was subjected to harassment and dowry demands, and she is willing to resume cohabitation.

Ratio Decidendi

The conduct of the wife in filing multiple false criminal complaints and the irretrievable breakdown of marriage due to over 13 years of separation constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, warranting divorce.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an unfortunate litigation that has lasted for more than a decade. The parties have been residing separately since 2nd September 2012. The marriage has irretrievably broken down and there is no possibility of reconciliation.

Procedural History

Appellant filed divorce petition on 24 June 2013 before Family Court, Thane. Family Court dismissed petition on 15 May 2019. Appellant filed appeal on 2019. Wife filed interim application in 2024. High Court reserved judgment on 15 October 2025 and pronounced on 14 November 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13(1)(i-a)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 125
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage and Long Separation Considered Cruelty. False Criminal Complaints and Over 13 Years of Separation Justif...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Applications in Land Acquisition Reference Dismissed Exparte Due to Advocate's Illness — Principles of Natural Justice Violated. The court held that dismissal of references without considering the advocate's sancti...