High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Reimbursement of Fees Under Section 12(2) of RTE Act for School Management. Education Officer Directed to Decide Reimbursement Claims Within Four Weeks for Students Admitted Under Section 12 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009....

The petitioners, a school management running Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Charitable Trust's English Medium School, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur seeking reimbursement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Education Officer to Decide Reimbursement Claims Under Section 12 of RTE Act, 2009 Within Four Weeks. School Management's Claims for Reimbursement of Fees for Students Admitted Under the RTE Act Must Be Decided Expeditiously to Fulfill the Purpose of the Act....

The petitioners, a school management and its trust, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur seeking a direction for reimbursement of fees/expenses under Section 12(2) of the Rig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Education Officer to Decide Reimbursement Claims Under Section 12(2) of RTE Act, 2009 Within Six Weeks. The court held that the authority must process claims expeditiously to fulfill the purpose of the social beneficial scheme under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009....

The petitioners, Shree Mahalaxmi English Medium School and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Charitable Trust, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur seeking reimbursement of fees u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Certificate in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Calculation. Court holds that Section 33-C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 cannot be used to adjudicate disputed claims requiring determination of entitlement, and that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by computing bonus amounts without a prior adjudication of rights....

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by Pawan Hans Limited challenging an order dated 27 June 2022 passed by the Authority under Section 33-C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Suit Filed Without Urgent Interim Relief and Without Mandatory Mediation is Barred....

The defendant, Dipti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking rejection of the plaint filed by the plaintiff, Buildc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Rejects Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Agreement for Sale Not Concluded Contract but Continuous Offer, Plaint Discloses Cause of Action....

The appellant, M/s. Everhome Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 15.07.2019 against the respondents, M/s. Aditya Developers and others. The agree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Against Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Decree in Eviction Suit. Decree Passed Not Ex-Parte but Under Order XVII Rule 2 CPC, as Defendants Had Appeared Earlier and Failed to Appear at Subsequent Hearings Without Sufficient Cause....

The dispute arose from an eviction suit filed by Kshtriya Dnyati Sabha, a registered public trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, against the heirs of the deceased original tenant. The suit w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Upholds Summary Rejection of Objection Petition Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Adjudicate Title When Objection is Frivolous and Collusive....

The appellant, Kamal W/o Vishwanath Jadhav, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2025 passed by the first appellate Court in R.C.A. No. 116/2025, which confirmed the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Due to Invalid Service of Summons. Service by affixture without prior attempt at personal service held invalid under Order V Rule 17 CPC, and ex-parte decree set aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC....

The appellant, M/s Arjun Travels, a sole proprietorship concern, was the owner of a vehicle involved in a motor accident. The respondents, being the legal representatives of the deceased, filed a clai...