High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Negligence of Claimant Not a Bar to Claim Under No-Fault Liability. The court held that Section 163-A is a no-fault provision and the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on grounds of contributory negligence....

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Shashikant Manubhai Bhatti (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses/Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim—Decision Not Captured. Composite Negligence and Quantum of Compensation Under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Were the Key Issues....

The matter involves an appeal and cross-objections arising from the judgment and award dated 14th August 2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Vadodara, in MACP No. 655 of 2011. The claim ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — No Evidence of Abetment to Suicide or Cruelty Under Sections 498A, 306, 114 IPC. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the deceased's dying declaration did not implicate the accused for abetment and that the prosecution failed to prove cruelty or dowry demand....

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Natvarsinh Manabhai Sodha Parmar and others (respondents) by the Sessions Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Sessions Case No.14 of 2010 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Abduction in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006 — Acquittal for Rape Stands. Appellant No.2's conviction under Sections 363, 366 and 114 IPC confirmed based on consistent testimony of prosecutrix and medical evidence....

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of conviction dated 31.07.2005 passed by the learned Fast Track Court, Bhavnagar in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006. The appellants, Vijay Kalub...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Acquits Appellants Under SC/ST Act. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 504, 506(2) IPC and Sections 3(1)(x), 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act set aside for lack of credible testimony....

The present criminal appeal was filed by the appellants, originally accused in Atrocity Sessions Case No.37 of 2001, challenging their conviction by the learned Special Judge, 3rd Fast Track Court, Ve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside MACT Order Deleting Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claim -- Premature Deletion Without Evidence Violates Natural Justice -- Reinstatement of Party for Proper Adjudication Under Motor Vehicles Act...

The High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed a writ petition challenging an order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) that deleted Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. as a respondent in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partially Allows Criminal Appeal -- Acquits Appellant Under Section 376-AB of IPC In POCSO u/s 4(2)Case Due To Lack Of Kidnapping Evidence -- Convictions Under Sections 363, 354-A(2) and 8 of POCSO maintained Upheld...

The appellant challenged his conviction for offences under IPC and POCSO Act. The High Court analyzed the evidence, focusing on the victim's testimony and age proof. The Court found that the victim vo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Modifies Forest Department Timing Restriction for Temple Access in Reserved Forest Area — Permits Night Stay for Religious Rituals. The court allowed the writ petition in part, directing modification of the timing condition to permit overnight stay for performing Nanda Deepa Pooja....

The petitioner, C. Easwaramoorthy, a devotee of Arulmigu Vellingiri Swayambhu Eeswaran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court. The temple is...