High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Order Quashing Promotions of Assistant Engineers. Promotions Made Without Following Recruitment Rules and Without MPSC Consultation Were Held Illegal....

The case involves multiple writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 11.9.2003 in Original Application No. 421 of 2003. The background is that the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer in Excise Duty Dispute Over Transit Insurance. Insurance cost incurred by manufacturer on behalf of dealer after factory gate sale is not includible in assessable value under Central Excise Act, 1944....

The petitioner, Mercedes Benz India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, manufactures motor vehicles and parts at its factory in Chakan, Pune. It sells vehicles to it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Scope Limited to Existing Adjudicated Rights. The court held that the Labour Court cannot decide new claims for benefits not awarded in the original reinstatement order, as Section 33(C)(2) is only for computation of pre-existing rights....

The petitioner, Smt. Neeta S. Pathak, was a workman who had been reinstated with back wages by an order dated 10th April 1991. Subsequently, she filed an application under Section 33(C)(2) of the Indu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Infructuous Due to Non-Existence of Control Order. Petition Rendered Infructuous as Punjab Rice Brand (Levy) Control Order, 1988 Was No Longer in Effect....

The case involved a writ petition filed by M/s. Kansal Rice Mills and others against the State of Punjab and others. The petitioners sought relief under the Punjab Rice Brand (Levy) Control Order, 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Customs Public Notice on IGM Amendment. Public Notice Prohibiting Amendment of Consignee Name After Bill of Entry Filed Held Reasonable and Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962....

The petitioner, Mr. Rakesh Dhir, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Public Notice No.2/1010 dated 14th January, 2010 and a consequential order dated 25th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery Notice Based on Division Bench Order. Division Bench order, even if ex parte, is binding on Single Bench and cannot be collaterally challenged in recovery proceedings....

The petitioner, Banwarilal Laxminarayan Sharma, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated 29.09.1997 issued by the Labour Court, Nashik in Misc. Recovery Proceedings No.58/1997. The dema...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 50C of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Stamp Duty Dispute. Development Agreement Stamp Duty Based on Ready Reckoner Rate Upheld; Section 50C Not Ultra Vires....

The petitioner, Bhatia Nagar Premises Cooperative Society Limited, is a cooperative society that owns land with a building. It entered into a Development Agreement with Ankur Realty Private Limited fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder, Robbery, and House Trespass in Doctor's Killing — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt....

The appellant, Sunil Nirmal Bisth, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.1267 of 1996 for offences under Sections 449, 392 read with 397, and 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Transport Dispute — Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Wrongful Detention. Order 7 Rule 10 CPC Return of Plaint Set Aside as Trial Court Failed to Consider That Part of Cause of Action Arose Within Its Jurisdiction....

The appellants, Mallikarjun Transport and Chitrarekha Omprakash Khake, were transporters who entered into a contract with Gangapur Cooperative Sugar Factory to transport molasses from the respondent's...