Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer in Excise Duty Dispute Over Transit Insurance. Insurance cost incurred by manufacturer on behalf of dealer after factory gate sale is not includible in assessable value under Central Excise Act, 1944.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mercedes Benz India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, manufactures motor vehicles and parts at its factory in Chakan, Pune. It sells vehicles to its dealers at the factory gate on payment of central excise duty on transaction value. The dealer is free to engage his own transporter and carry the goods from the factory gate. However, under the dealer agreement, the petitioner arranges for transportation/transit insurance on behalf of the dealers. The Revenue contended that the cost of such transit insurance should be included in the assessable value for excise duty. The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal. The petitioner challenged this order before the High Court. The High Court held that since the sale is completed at the factory gate and the dealer has the option to arrange his own transport, the insurance cost incurred by the petitioner on behalf of the dealer is not part of the transaction value and hence not includible in the assessable value. The court allowed the petition, setting aside the Tribunal's order.

Headnote

A) Central Excise - Assessable Value - Transit Insurance - Inclusion - The issue was whether the cost of transit insurance arranged by the manufacturer on behalf of the dealer is part of the transaction value for excise duty. The court held that since the insurance is arranged after the sale is complete at the factory gate and the dealer is free to choose his own transporter, the insurance cost is not includible in the assessable value. (Paras 3-5)

B) Central Excise - Transaction Value - Factory Gate Sale - The court held that when goods are sold at the factory gate on payment of excise duty on transaction value, any subsequent cost incurred by the manufacturer on behalf of the dealer, such as transit insurance, does not form part of the assessable value. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cost of transit insurance incurred by the manufacturer on behalf of the dealer is includible in the assessable value for the purpose of payment of central excise duty.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, setting aside the Tribunal's order dated 20th November, 2009. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Cenvat Credit
  • Assessable Value
  • Transit Insurance
  • Transaction Value
  • Excise Duty
  • Inclusion of Insurance Cost
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (03) 116

WRIT PETITION NO. 1614 OF 2010

2010-03-17

V.C.Daga, K.K.Tated

V.Sridharan with Jas Sanghvi i/b. PDS Legal for the petitioner, R.B.Pardeshi for the respondents

Mercedes Benz India Private Limited

Union of India and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Tribunal allowing Revenue's appeal regarding inclusion of transit insurance cost in assessable value for excise duty.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of Tribunal's order dated 20th November, 2009.

Filing Reason

Petitioner aggrieved by Tribunal's order holding that cost of transit insurance arranged by petitioner on behalf of dealers is includible in assessable value for excise duty.

Previous Decisions

Tribunal allowed Revenue's appeal on 20th November, 2009.

Issues

Whether the cost of transit insurance incurred by the manufacturer on behalf of the dealer is includible in the assessable value for the purpose of payment of central excise duty.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that sale is at factory gate on transaction value and dealer is free to choose transporter; insurance cost is not part of assessable value. Revenue argued that insurance cost should be included in assessable value.

Ratio Decidendi

When goods are sold at factory gate on payment of excise duty on transaction value, any subsequent cost incurred by the manufacturer on behalf of the dealer, such as transit insurance, does not form part of the assessable value.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is selling the said vehicles to its dealers at the factory gate. The dealer is free to engage his own transporter and carry the goods from the factory gate of the petitioner to his premises. However, in terms of dealer agreement, petitioner arranges for transportation/ transit insurance of behalf of the dealers.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Tribunal dated 20th November, 2009, which allowed the Revenue's appeal. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 17th March, 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944:
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurer's Appeal and Dismisses Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Contributory Negligence of Injured Cyclist Assessed at 50% Due to Sudden Entry onto Highway. The court apportioned negligence equally b...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer in Excise Duty Dispute Over Transit Insurance. Insurance cost incurred by manufacturer on behalf of dealer after factory gate sale is not includible in assessable value under Central Excise Act, 1944.