High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears CBI appeal against discharge order of MCOCA Special Court in Telgi Stamp Case, involving allegations of aiding organized crime syndicate by a senior police officer. Court examines whether material on record justified framing of charges under MCOCA and IPC, considering scope of Section 227 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973....

Background: The appeal arose from the Telgi Stamp Case, a massive counterfeiting operation involving government stamps and stamp papers. The Central Bureau of Investigation filed an appeal under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Preliminary Objection on Applicability of Section 392 of CrPC vs Clause 36 of Letters Patent in MCOCA Appeal. Division Bench Equally Divided on Discharge of Accused in Telgi Stamp Case; Issue Raised Whether Third Judge Must Decide Only Points of Difference or Hear Entire Appeal....

The proceedings concerned an appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999, challenging the discharge of accused No. 55 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Grampanchayat's Writ Petition for Lack of Locus Standi in Heirship Certificate Amendment Challenge. Group Grampanchayat not a 'person aggrieved' under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 as it had no legal interest in the estate of the deceased....

The case involves a writ petition filed by Group Grampanchayat, Sasavane challenging an order dated 6 January 2010 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Baramati, which allowed an amendment appl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in License vs. Tenancy Dispute — Open Site Held Not Part of Tenanted Premises. The court restored the trial court's decree for possession, holding that the suit site was a license and not part of the tenancy under the C.P. & Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order....

The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for possession of a triangular open site admeasuring 60 sq.ft. against the respondents-defendants, alleging that the site was given on license free of charge and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Property Suit — First Appellate Court Justified in Rejecting Additional Evidence Under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. The court held that the appellant failed to show that the documents could not be produced earlier or were not within his knowledge, and no substantial question of law arose....

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellant, Laxman s/o Bajirao Kondekar, against the judgment and decree of the first Appellate Court which confirmed the trial court's decree in favor of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Ejectment Suit — Plaintiff Entitled to Vacant Possession as Licensee's Possession Becomes Unlawful After Transfer. The court held that the defendants, who were originally licensees of the previous owner, cannot deny the title of the plaintiff-transferee and must deliver possession....

The appellant, Smt. Sarita Gopalkumar Chand, filed a suit for ejectment and vacant possession of suit plot No.253 in CRS III Scheme, NIT Middle Precinct, Nagpur, admeasuring 1500 sq.ft. The suit prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Revision Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Matter Remanded for Fresh Hearing. Failure to provide cross-examination of witnesses and reliance on ex-parte statements without opportunity to rebut renders revisional order unsustainable under Section 129DD of the Customs Act, 1962....

The petitioners, Meadows Shipping Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 18 October 2010 passed by the Government of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal in Trade Mark Infringement Case Where Corporate Name Used for Dissimilar Goods. Court Examines Whether Section 29(4) or 29(5) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Applies When Registered Mark Is Part of Tradename for Unrelated Pharmaceuticals....

The appeal arose from a suit filed by Raymond Limited (plaintiff) against Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (defendant) for trade mark infringement. The plaintiff, a well-known textile company, had re...