Case Note & Summary
The petitioners, Sunil Vilasrao Patil and Vijaykumar Sadashiv Nimbalkar, were teachers working in night schools run by respondent No.1, Shri Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha. They filed writ petitions seeking directions to be appointed as full-time Assistant Teachers in the secondary schools run by the same management, with effect from their first appointment dates in 1995-1996. The petitioners argued that other similarly placed teachers had been given full-time appointments in secondary schools, and they sought similar treatment. The respondents opposed the petitions, contending that night schools are separate entities and that the petitioners had no right to claim absorption in secondary schools. The court examined the facts and found that the petitioners were appointed specifically in night schools, which are distinct from secondary schools. The court noted that there were no sanctioned posts in the secondary schools for the petitioners, and their appointments in night schools did not confer any right to be absorbed in secondary schools. The court held that the claim for full-time appointment was not maintainable, as the petitioners were not appointed against any sanctioned post in the secondary schools. The court dismissed both writ petitions, finding no merit in the petitioners' claims.
Headnote
A) Service Law - Appointment - Night School vs. Secondary School - Right to Absorption - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - The petitioners, teachers in night schools, sought directions to be appointed as full-time Assistant Teachers in secondary schools. The court held that night schools are separate entities and teachers appointed there have no right to claim absorption in secondary schools, especially when there are no sanctioned posts. The claim was based on alleged similar treatment of other teachers, but the court found no legal basis for such a claim. (Paras 1-6) B) Service Law - Appointment - Sanctioned Posts - Requirement - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - The court observed that appointment as a full-time teacher in a secondary school requires a sanctioned post. Since the petitioners were appointed in night schools, which are separate, they cannot claim a right to be absorbed in secondary schools without a sanctioned post. (Paras 4-6)
Issue of Consideration
Whether teachers appointed in night schools run by the management are entitled to be appointed as full-time Assistant Teachers in the secondary schools run by the same management.
Final Decision
Both writ petitions dismissed. No order as to costs.
Law Points
- Appointment in night school does not confer right to absorption in secondary school
- Night school is a separate entity
- No sanctioned post in secondary school
- Claim for full-time appointment not maintainable
- Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act
- 1977
- Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Regulations
- 1965




