High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Teacher's Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal Order on Graduate Pay Scale Entitlement -- Maintainability Under MEPS Act and Finality of Earlier Judicial Order Upheld...

The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a teacher challenging the School Tribunal's rejection of her appeal for graduate pay scale entitlement -- The petitioner, appointed in 1986 with S.S.C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Andhra Pradesh Examines Condonation of 1803-Day Delay in Filing Criminal Revision Against Discharge in UAPA Case. Delay Condonation Under Section 5 of Limitation Act Challenged as Prosecution Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Over Five-Year Delay....

This criminal revision petition before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh arose from an order condoning an inordinate delay of 1803 days. The dispute originated with Crime No.2 of 2016 registered at Dum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition as Infructuous After Petitioner's Counsel Submits Nothing Survives. Petitioner's challenge to office order dated 15.7.2015 became infructuous as per counsel's submission....

The petitioner, Dr. Basant Kumar Tiwary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court. He sought a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash an offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Widow's Challenge to DCRG Deduction Without Decree or Attachment Order. Deduction of Rs.1,93,052/- from Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity Based on Mere Pendency of Civil Suit Held Illegal....

The petitioner, G. Jayalakshmi, widow of late N. Gopu, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 04.05.2016 by which the Joint Director of Agriculture, Dharmapuri, deducted Rs.4,50,207/- from t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Canal Promboke Classification — Inter-Departmental Communication Not Actionable in Writ Proceedings. Disputed Facts Regarding Land Ownership Must Be Adjudicated by Civil Court, Not in Writ Jurisdiction....

The petitioners, S. Krishnamurthy and D. S. Subramaniam, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 23.09.2021 issued by the Assistant Director/P.A. to the District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Demand for Assignment Fee and Ground Rent for Government Land Lease Transfer. Government Order Dated 27.01.2004 Upheld as Valid and Binding....

The present writ appeals were filed by Sree Maruthi Agrotech Limited and its director K. Gurumoorthy against the Salt Commissioner and Deputy Salt Commissioner, challenging the order of a learned sing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Electricity Disconnection Case Due to Suppression of Facts and Abuse of Process. Appellant's failure to disclose earlier civil suit and pending appeal leads to dismissal of writ petition seeking disconnection of electricity connections....

The appellant, K. Gurusamy, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board to disconnect electricity service connections bearing Nos. 680 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Penalty Case for Wrongful DTAA Claim — No Concealment Found. Assessee's Bonafide Belief That India-China DTAA Applied to Hong Kong Based on Official Document Precludes Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961....

The revenue appealed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which set aside the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Applications in Service Benefits Case — No Error Apparent in Original Order Confirmed by Supreme Court. Review Applicants Sought Service Benefits Including Promotions and Revision of Pay but Failed to Show Any Error Apparent on Face of Record Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC....

The applicants, employees of the Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, filed review applications under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking review of a common order dated 10.07.201...