High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty Based on Dying Declaration. Dying declaration found credible and corroborated by medical evidence and motive under Sections 302 and 498A IPC....

The appellant, Raju s/o Dadarao Mhaslekar, was convicted by the learned Extra Joint Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna in Sessions Case No.81/2010 for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 49...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Under Section 302 IPC — Evidence of Witnesses and Medical Reports Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Case Based on Testimony of Eyewitnesses and Recovery of Weapons....

The appellant, Kailash s/o Jagdeo Gade, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon in Sessions Trial No.25 of 2007 for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case....

The appellants, Mangesh Vitthal Waghmare and Devidas Balchandra Rathod, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, in Atrocity Case No. 36/2006 for the offence of gang rape under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix. Voluntary Accompaniment by Minor Girl Fails to Establish Enticement Under Section 363 IPC....

The appellant, Hemraj s/o Sampatrao Bhoyar, was convicted by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 163/1997 for the offence punishable under Section 363 of the Indian Penal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claims of Resigned Judicial Officers in Service Law Dispute. Resignation Does Not Forfeit Statutory Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Judicial Officers with Over 12 Years of Service....

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by former judicial officers of the Maharashtra State Judicial Service. The petitioners, Jeevan Kashinath Patil and Navinchandra Brijaratnlal Shah, had se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal and Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent, Waiving Six-Month Waiting Period Under Section 13B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act. Joint application filed during appeal treated as petition for mutual consent divorce, and instant decree granted as parties had been separated for over six years....

The dispute arose from a Family Court Appeal filed by the husband against the dismissal of his divorce petition. The husband had originally sought divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute Due to Limitation. Claim Filed Beyond Six-Month Period Under BSE Regulation 252(2) Is Barred....

The petitioner, Kalpana Munish Bumb, was a constituent of respondent no. 1, a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange. The last transaction between the parties occurred in March 2008. A dispute ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Under DCR 33(10) — Scheme Substantially Implemented, No Interference Warranted. Petitioners Failed to Establish Locus Standi or Eligibility, and the Scheme Had Progressed to Construction Stage....

The case involves a writ petition filed by twenty-one persons claiming to be occupants of a slum known as Meer Hussain Tangewala Chawl on land owned by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Contradicts Rape Allegation....

The appellant, Ravindra Yogiraj Paul, was convicted by the Special Judge (Atrocity Case) for offences under Sections 376, 363, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 3(1)(xii) of the Sched...